@phresh11one.bsky.social
He hit you with the Bill Ackman 😂
December 27, 2025 at 11:30 AM
He hit you with the Bill Ackman 😂
Them shits bout to be all in the streets
December 22, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Them shits bout to be all in the streets
Sure you can.
"Eat the Rich."
"Seize the means of production."
"We are the 99%."
People sell that message all the time. Avatar just has no cultural impact.
"Eat the Rich."
"Seize the means of production."
"We are the 99%."
People sell that message all the time. Avatar just has no cultural impact.
December 22, 2025 at 11:21 AM
Sure you can.
"Eat the Rich."
"Seize the means of production."
"We are the 99%."
People sell that message all the time. Avatar just has no cultural impact.
"Eat the Rich."
"Seize the means of production."
"We are the 99%."
People sell that message all the time. Avatar just has no cultural impact.
Why do I gotta take aughts Pocahontas seriously?
I saw the first one. It was Pocahontas. Can I stop now?
I saw the first one. It was Pocahontas. Can I stop now?
December 22, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Why do I gotta take aughts Pocahontas seriously?
I saw the first one. It was Pocahontas. Can I stop now?
I saw the first one. It was Pocahontas. Can I stop now?
This is facts.
December 19, 2025 at 6:32 PM
This is facts.
Nothing more emasculating
December 19, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Nothing more emasculating
1. It may never pop (bc Sacks seems weirdly interested in giving a bailout)
2. Isn't it more likely that they simply convey for a fraction of current value to the same hyperscalers renting compute out of them?
2. Isn't it more likely that they simply convey for a fraction of current value to the same hyperscalers renting compute out of them?
December 19, 2025 at 6:19 PM
1. It may never pop (bc Sacks seems weirdly interested in giving a bailout)
2. Isn't it more likely that they simply convey for a fraction of current value to the same hyperscalers renting compute out of them?
2. Isn't it more likely that they simply convey for a fraction of current value to the same hyperscalers renting compute out of them?
An HR head sleeping with the CEO is about as unprofessional and unethical as it gets.
December 19, 2025 at 6:10 PM
An HR head sleeping with the CEO is about as unprofessional and unethical as it gets.
Usually the rule in every state is votes held at a teleconference are only effective to the extent everyone within the conference can clearly hear the other.
If the Representative was purposefully muted, I'd be curious if the vote was effective at all.
If the Representative was purposefully muted, I'd be curious if the vote was effective at all.
December 19, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Usually the rule in every state is votes held at a teleconference are only effective to the extent everyone within the conference can clearly hear the other.
If the Representative was purposefully muted, I'd be curious if the vote was effective at all.
If the Representative was purposefully muted, I'd be curious if the vote was effective at all.
When I was broke, every girlfriend I ever had would share whatever she had w me. And would be happy about it.
December 18, 2025 at 9:27 PM
When I was broke, every girlfriend I ever had would share whatever she had w me. And would be happy about it.
The women ugly too.
December 18, 2025 at 9:24 PM
The women ugly too.
This mfer is a badass
December 14, 2025 at 2:51 PM
This mfer is a badass
Cmon brudda, you gotta marry that girl
December 13, 2025 at 3:38 PM
Cmon brudda, you gotta marry that girl
It's a contract, either party can add what they choose to it. That's negotiation. If you seek to negotiate a prenup in your favor, you should be prepared for your potential spouse also looking to negotiate in their own favor.
Better advice: just go talk to a licensed attorney
Better advice: just go talk to a licensed attorney
December 2, 2025 at 1:12 AM
It's a contract, either party can add what they choose to it. That's negotiation. If you seek to negotiate a prenup in your favor, you should be prepared for your potential spouse also looking to negotiate in their own favor.
Better advice: just go talk to a licensed attorney
Better advice: just go talk to a licensed attorney
This assumes that the wife comes into possession of valuable assets. If the wife's position is that certain assets she may come into possession of should be excluded from the marital estate, the husband will likely take the same position on assets he gets possession of.
I.e., this can backfire
I.e., this can backfire
December 2, 2025 at 1:07 AM
This assumes that the wife comes into possession of valuable assets. If the wife's position is that certain assets she may come into possession of should be excluded from the marital estate, the husband will likely take the same position on assets he gets possession of.
I.e., this can backfire
I.e., this can backfire
Aight I'll ask: why?
If you're broke what assets would this protect? Even if not, how would this be better than simply defaulting to state law on division of assets/alimony?
And why wouldn't you expect your potential husband to negotiate the prenup?
This is a solution chasing a problem.
If you're broke what assets would this protect? Even if not, how would this be better than simply defaulting to state law on division of assets/alimony?
And why wouldn't you expect your potential husband to negotiate the prenup?
This is a solution chasing a problem.
December 1, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Aight I'll ask: why?
If you're broke what assets would this protect? Even if not, how would this be better than simply defaulting to state law on division of assets/alimony?
And why wouldn't you expect your potential husband to negotiate the prenup?
This is a solution chasing a problem.
If you're broke what assets would this protect? Even if not, how would this be better than simply defaulting to state law on division of assets/alimony?
And why wouldn't you expect your potential husband to negotiate the prenup?
This is a solution chasing a problem.
The coat, My G
🤌🏿
🤌🏿
November 30, 2025 at 10:22 PM
The coat, My G
🤌🏿
🤌🏿
My man had the best send-off 😂
November 29, 2025 at 4:07 PM
My man had the best send-off 😂
The answer is feudalism. Per Altman:
"We should therefore focus on taxing capital rather than labor, and we should use these taxes as an opportunity to directly distribute ownership and wealth to citizens."
I.e. U work and live on my land, you take a small cut of its produce for your subsistence.
"We should therefore focus on taxing capital rather than labor, and we should use these taxes as an opportunity to directly distribute ownership and wealth to citizens."
I.e. U work and live on my land, you take a small cut of its produce for your subsistence.
November 28, 2025 at 11:52 PM
The answer is feudalism. Per Altman:
"We should therefore focus on taxing capital rather than labor, and we should use these taxes as an opportunity to directly distribute ownership and wealth to citizens."
I.e. U work and live on my land, you take a small cut of its produce for your subsistence.
"We should therefore focus on taxing capital rather than labor, and we should use these taxes as an opportunity to directly distribute ownership and wealth to citizens."
I.e. U work and live on my land, you take a small cut of its produce for your subsistence.