Philosophy Now
philosophynow.bsky.social
Philosophy Now
@philosophynow.bsky.social
A magazine of ideas
https://philosophynow.org
JUST OUT: Issue 171 dives into #Happiness: the pursuit of the #GoodLife, the tension between #pleasure and #purpose, and what it really means to #flourish today. With reflections on #Ethics, #Neurotechnology and philosophical classics re-examined. philosophynow.org/issues/171
December 8, 2025 at 12:28 PM
In Philosophy Now Issue 170: an original dialogue between Emma Jones and Prof. Luce #Irigaray, the pioneering Belgian-French feminist philosopher and psychoanalyst. Their challenging, fascinating talk focuses on Irigaray's most recent book, "The Mediation of Touch"
philosophynow.org/issues/170/T...
December 7, 2025 at 3:03 PM
In "Macmurray on Relationship" (issue 170) Jeanne Warren presents John Macmurray’s philosophy, who argues that the fundamental unit of personal reality is not ‘I’, but ‘you-and-I’. Whose side are you on - Sartre 😈 or Macmurray 😇? Read full article: philosophynow.org/issues/170/M...
December 5, 2025 at 12:38 PM
To celebrate the life and legacy of Tom Stoppard, read "Wittgenstein: Stoppard’s Muse" by Fergus Edwards @drfergusedwards.bsky.social in issue 154: philosophynow.org/issues/154/W...
December 3, 2025 at 10:18 AM
Reposted by Philosophy Now
For those who want to know more about philosophy in Stoppard: "Wittgenstein: Stoppard's Muse" is in the Feb 2023 edition of @philosophynow.bsky.social
November 30, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Katharine Mullen interviews Karl Sigmund on his books "The Waltz of Reason" (the history of interplay between maths and philosophy), and "Exact Thinking in Demented Times: The Vienna Circle and the Epic Quest for the Foundations of Science". Read here: philosophynow.org/issues/170/K...
December 1, 2025 at 11:43 AM
John P. Irish considers some principles of history through the history of the historian Edward Gibbon (1737-1794): philosophynow.org/issues/170/E...
November 28, 2025 at 9:40 AM
In "Can AI Teach Our Grandmothers To Suck Eggs?" (issue 170) Louis Tempany wonders whether human life will become so diminished that we will require machines to do everything for us, and what that might mean for our humanity. Read award-winning essay: philosophynow.org/issues/170/C...
November 26, 2025 at 9:50 AM
Philosophical fiction: In "The Primates" Samantha Neave visits a future where almost all animals have rights: philosophynow.org/issues/170/T...
November 21, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Happy World Philosophy Day! For this special occasions, we are inviting you to revisit Aristotle's idea of life of (philosophical) contemplation as the ultimate happiness. Do you agree? Read for further context: philosophynow.org/issues/151/A...
November 20, 2025 at 12:44 PM
In Philosophy Now's most recent issue 170, Raymond Tallis revisits Anselm's famous Ontological Argument for the existence of God, and contends that a definition of God cannot necessitate God’s existence: philosophynow.org/issues/170/R...
November 17, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Read “The Mediation of Touch”, a conversation with Luce Irigaray, a philosopher, psychoanalyst and the author of many books, including "The Mediation of Touch" (2024), in issue 170: philosophynow.org/issues/170/T...
November 14, 2025 at 11:33 AM
In "What My Sister Taught Me About Humanity", Lee Clarke powerfully argues that we need a more inclusive view of moral personhood. Picture: the author's sister Laura. Read Clarke's personal story and her proposed criteria for common humanity: philosophynow.org/issues/170/W...
November 10, 2025 at 5:12 PM
“The observer isn’t just watching reality — but helping shape it.” Do you agree? #QuantumPhysics meets #IndianPhilosophy in a dialogue about consciousness, causality & the illusion of separateness. Art by Paul Gregory. Read in issue 170: philosophynow.org/issues/170/Q...
November 6, 2025 at 12:12 PM
Marx, Nietzsche and Sartre walk into a cafe and order hot chocolate. Can you come up with a punch line? For inspiration, take a sip of "Philosophers on Chocolate" by Matt Qvortrup: philosophynow.org/issues/170/P...
November 4, 2025 at 12:40 PM
Halloween special: Daniel Toré asks whether it’s morally wrong to enjoy horror (archives, issue 156). Do you like watching horror? And what do you make of it?
philosophynow.org/issues/156/T...
October 31, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Read "Alchemy, Mining, Speculation & Experimentation" by Okan Nurettin Okur in issue 170 if you’re curious about how ancient speculation, experiment and metaphysics still shape our thinking about nature. Art: Chemistry by Paul Gregory philosophynow.org/issues/170/A...
October 30, 2025 at 9:56 AM
Is moral flexibility a virtue in the workplace, what do you think? Art by Steve Delmonte 2025
October 29, 2025 at 2:17 PM
In Hit Man, Jason and Lauren Friend discuss the idea of reprogramming oneself as raised by Richard Linklater's film. Can we truly reinvent ourselves, or are we bound by who we’ve been? philosophynow.org/issues/170/H...
October 27, 2025 at 4:05 PM
Spotted in the wild: Philosophy Now Issue 170 on the newsstand in Waitrose supermarket, Biggin Hill.
October 26, 2025 at 6:35 PM
In "Living According To Nature", Massimo Pigliucci talks about how the Stoics and the Epicureans interpreted this idea, and how to reconcile our eudaimonic (character-cultivating) and hedonic (pleasure-seeking) objectives. Art: Woman in Nature by Paul Gregory philosophynow.org/issues/170/L...
October 22, 2025 at 7:01 PM
In "Collective Action & Climate Change" Nevin Chellappah presents the argument that there is no moral reason to reduce our emissions formally, and proceeds to refute its foundational premises. Art © Chris Gill 2025 philosophynow.org/issues/170/C...
October 21, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Can anyone come up with an alternative caption?
Cartoon by © Harley Schwadron 2025 in the new issue of Philosophy Now
October 20, 2025 at 3:55 PM
In "Forced Vaccination" Naina Krishnamurthy argues (employing social contract theory, utilitarianism and ethics of care) that during times of crisis, it is not merely justifiable but morally necessary. Do you agree? Art: Stephen Lahey philosophynow.org/issues/170/F...
October 16, 2025 at 2:17 PM
In "Moral Decision-Making for a Job Search", Norman Schultz proposes three criteria for an immoral job: it harms people, it requires intentional deception and it plays a key role in a morally troubling industry. Do you agree? Art by Melanie Wu philosophynow.org/issues/170/M...
October 14, 2025 at 12:43 PM