I do not find the term unconscious consciousness appropriate.
I think is more precise to speak of consciousness manifesting in different modes of awareness.

4/🧵 Read, cite, build on it.

PDF in Tweet 1.

#Philosophy #OpenScience

3/🧵 Metrics:

🌟 E_neg/E_ent → 0 = agony (physics)

🧬 K<1 = loss of control (biology)

🤖 I<0.5 = info collapse (cybernetics)

Empirical.
Testable.

2/🧵 Three phases:

✅ Stable (negentropy rules)
⚠️ Pre-agony (entropy rises)
💀 Agony (collapse)

Same in stars, cells, AI.

Measurable.
Scalable.

Although this is the case, it is no proof of the correctness of panpsychism. 2/2

Physicalism produces nothing.
There is a very successful science called physics.
Its field of knowledge, however – like that of every science – is not absolute but limited.
Physics as a science would not be possible without consciousness. 1/2

It is neither goal-directed nor intentional but arises directly from the mutual interaction and the structural constitution of the systems involved. 2/2

Both panpsychism and physicalism assert an absolutist view of reality, maintaining that the world is fundamentally constituted as they propose, while remaining incapable of empirically verifying this assertion.

A metaphysical perspective – such as panpsychism or physicalism – explains nothing but postulates.
The models that are subsequently developed are based on these postulates.

The panpsychist element is information processing:
modulation of systems according to the system’s own nature, to make input effective for internal processes. 3/3

This response depends on: its own structure, the structure of its interaction partners, and the balance of force and counterforce.

Structures change,
new information is ontically constituted,
new causal relations are brought about. /2