Phil Armitage
@philip-armitage.bsky.social
Astrophysicist at Flatiron CCA & Stony Brook working on accretion and planet formation. Also Mr. Pisconti / Nico’s dad / hiker / Zwifter / (lapsed) photographer
You’re being generous: of course I didn’t even consider it overdue at all until a year after the deadline!
May 23, 2025 at 12:22 PM
You’re being generous: of course I didn’t even consider it overdue at all until a year after the deadline!
For most papers, reviewers are still responding pretty generously to my requests (thanks!).
No doubt though: “routine” results are not communicated as concisely as in the past. It’s become vastly easier to do many analyses, which is good but adds to the review work a lot.
No doubt though: “routine” results are not communicated as concisely as in the past. It’s become vastly easier to do many analyses, which is good but adds to the review work a lot.
May 13, 2025 at 3:23 AM
For most papers, reviewers are still responding pretty generously to my requests (thanks!).
No doubt though: “routine” results are not communicated as concisely as in the past. It’s become vastly easier to do many analyses, which is good but adds to the review work a lot.
No doubt though: “routine” results are not communicated as concisely as in the past. It’s become vastly easier to do many analyses, which is good but adds to the review work a lot.