Peter Ness
@peterness.bsky.social
PHD (Sc., Eng. & Complexity from Tokyo Uni, MBA (UWA), MS (geology, UWA), MComs (Finance, Curtin Uni), Ba.Ap.Sc. (Applied geol. & geophys, SAIT/UniSA). PHD thesis: Asteroid Mining. Write Heni Hani & Dimensions novels, strategy books. Nobody is invincible.
My PHD was on the geochemical abundance & anomalies of meteorites, asteroids, moon, mars & earth at Tokyo Uni. A 70 element solar chemistry is affect by 5~6 supernova, nursery, skew, kurtosis, abundance, totalling +1^E10 chemical variations; & MOST of them are NOT comets; but, hey its a "pet" comet!
November 11, 2025 at 1:58 PM
My PHD was on the geochemical abundance & anomalies of meteorites, asteroids, moon, mars & earth at Tokyo Uni. A 70 element solar chemistry is affect by 5~6 supernova, nursery, skew, kurtosis, abundance, totalling +1^E10 chemical variations; & MOST of them are NOT comets; but, hey its a "pet" comet!
It is NOT a comet. You cherry pick data & refuse to toss the theory. The Chinese said the chemistry is protoplanetary NOT comet material. You cannot explain the anomalies so discredit others, & keep claiming its a comet to snake oil sell your pet theory - like the FAKE mainstream & Big bang models!
November 11, 2025 at 11:20 AM
It is NOT a comet. You cherry pick data & refuse to toss the theory. The Chinese said the chemistry is protoplanetary NOT comet material. You cannot explain the anomalies so discredit others, & keep claiming its a comet to snake oil sell your pet theory - like the FAKE mainstream & Big bang models!
Avi Loeb has published +700 papers, 95% in top peer reviewed journals. How many have all those character assassinating him published? He NEVER said its alien. He knows its NOT a comet. The pet comet trick is to 'explain away' the anomalies, as they did with the FAILED mainstream & Big Bang models.
November 11, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Avi Loeb has published +700 papers, 95% in top peer reviewed journals. How many have all those character assassinating him published? He NEVER said its alien. He knows its NOT a comet. The pet comet trick is to 'explain away' the anomalies, as they did with the FAILED mainstream & Big Bang models.
So ... breaking it down ... 5 months 27 days to learn, and 3 days to teach the Octopus??
November 11, 2025 at 11:06 AM
So ... breaking it down ... 5 months 27 days to learn, and 3 days to teach the Octopus??
Its NOT a comet. China proved its protoplanetary NOT comet material, & Ni:Fe ratios aren't either. My 8 Merensky reef melanorite, harzenburgite, trocolite & anorthosite samples have NiO-FeS ratios of 1 or >1. In 2827C liquid immiscibility melts the ratios would be +10X higher as Fe2O3 is removed.
November 11, 2025 at 11:05 AM
Its NOT a comet. China proved its protoplanetary NOT comet material, & Ni:Fe ratios aren't either. My 8 Merensky reef melanorite, harzenburgite, trocolite & anorthosite samples have NiO-FeS ratios of 1 or >1. In 2827C liquid immiscibility melts the ratios would be +10X higher as Fe2O3 is removed.
Its NOT a comet. The Ni:Fe ratios form by manufacturing, magmatic segregation & liquid Immiscibility, NOT in comets. China proved its protoplanetary (inner planet) NOT cometary material. No comet has a sun pointing tail. I've 8 Merensky reef samples of Ni:Fe~1, at 2827C it would be MUCH higher. QED!
November 11, 2025 at 10:58 AM
Its NOT a comet. The Ni:Fe ratios form by manufacturing, magmatic segregation & liquid Immiscibility, NOT in comets. China proved its protoplanetary (inner planet) NOT cometary material. No comet has a sun pointing tail. I've 8 Merensky reef samples of Ni:Fe~1, at 2827C it would be MUCH higher. QED!
In my response to Avi's latest post I replied (in Medium) with proof it is NOT a comet, that it is a fragment of a protoplanet with 100% proof & postulated it may be both natural & artificial. Advanced aliens could easily do that. My US patent application shows how. mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#in...
Gmail
Gmail is email that’s intuitive, efficient, and useful. 15 GB of storage, less spam, and mobile access.
mail.google.com
November 11, 2025 at 9:52 AM
In my response to Avi's latest post I replied (in Medium) with proof it is NOT a comet, that it is a fragment of a protoplanet with 100% proof & postulated it may be both natural & artificial. Advanced aliens could easily do that. My US patent application shows how. mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#in...
The PET comet theory is FAKE. The Ni-Fe ratio reflects refining, magmatic differentiation or liquid immiscibility, NOT found in comets. Chemistry reflects protoplanets from hot Venus or Earths in an inner solar system, NOT comets. The sun facing tail is NOT found in ANY comet. Stop faking evidence.
November 11, 2025 at 9:45 AM
The PET comet theory is FAKE. The Ni-Fe ratio reflects refining, magmatic differentiation or liquid immiscibility, NOT found in comets. Chemistry reflects protoplanets from hot Venus or Earths in an inner solar system, NOT comets. The sun facing tail is NOT found in ANY comet. Stop faking evidence.
Here I prove your 'pet' comet theory FAKE. (1) The Ni-Fe ratio can ONLY be explained by manufacturing, magmatic differentiation or liquid immiscibility (Merensky reef, Sudbury). (2) The chemistry reflects protoplanetary NOT comet structure, (3) a sun-facing outgassing is not seen in NAY comet. QED!
November 11, 2025 at 9:39 AM
Here I prove your 'pet' comet theory FAKE. (1) The Ni-Fe ratio can ONLY be explained by manufacturing, magmatic differentiation or liquid immiscibility (Merensky reef, Sudbury). (2) The chemistry reflects protoplanetary NOT comet structure, (3) a sun-facing outgassing is not seen in NAY comet. QED!
Nonsense. Nobody even knew galaxies existed until the 18th century, and it wasn't proven until 1920 when Edwin Hubble confirmed it. Try a FACT check.
November 7, 2025 at 9:10 AM
Nonsense. Nobody even knew galaxies existed until the 18th century, and it wasn't proven until 1920 when Edwin Hubble confirmed it. Try a FACT check.
It'd be great if scientists observed data, interpreted it in different ways, converted those into testable hypothesis, then tested ALL of them, then published the results FREE of their PET big bang or PET COMET theory. Its a big HINT a theory is wrong if its forced to fit instead of being replaced!
November 4, 2025 at 3:58 AM
It'd be great if scientists observed data, interpreted it in different ways, converted those into testable hypothesis, then tested ALL of them, then published the results FREE of their PET big bang or PET COMET theory. Its a big HINT a theory is wrong if its forced to fit instead of being replaced!
Avi Loeb is suggesting that scientists should collect data & interpret it from different perspectives, then create testable hypothesis for EACH, not just for a PET theory, then report the results unbiased. The PET comet theory ASSUMES other theories are wrong by default: thats religion, NOT science.
November 3, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Avi Loeb is suggesting that scientists should collect data & interpret it from different perspectives, then create testable hypothesis for EACH, not just for a PET theory, then report the results unbiased. The PET comet theory ASSUMES other theories are wrong by default: thats religion, NOT science.
Its not a 'pet theory' comet & changing the definitions to force it to fit doesn't prove it is. That's no different to claiming a house, which is 1000 time larger & more massive than a car, is a car as people move in & out of each, some cars stop for long periods of time, & they both have roofs!
November 2, 2025 at 11:04 AM
Its not a 'pet theory' comet & changing the definitions to force it to fit doesn't prove it is. That's no different to claiming a house, which is 1000 time larger & more massive than a car, is a car as people move in & out of each, some cars stop for long periods of time, & they both have roofs!
It is NOT a comet. The high mass, CO2, Ni-Fe ratio, forward facing tail & lack of degassing can be explained by an exploded venus-like planetoid core & magmatic differentiation or large scale liquid immiscibility, or an ejected protoplanet from a white dwarf with CO2 disk shedding its outer layer!
November 2, 2025 at 4:08 AM
It is NOT a comet. The high mass, CO2, Ni-Fe ratio, forward facing tail & lack of degassing can be explained by an exploded venus-like planetoid core & magmatic differentiation or large scale liquid immiscibility, or an ejected protoplanet from a white dwarf with CO2 disk shedding its outer layer!
Two things we know for certain: (1) 3i Atlas is NOT a comet: stop making those claims. It may be an alien mother ship or an exploded venus-type planetoid, or a protoplanet ejected from a white dwarf shedding its outer layer. Just NOT a comet. (2) NASA is no longer a trusted source for science.
November 2, 2025 at 4:03 AM
Two things we know for certain: (1) 3i Atlas is NOT a comet: stop making those claims. It may be an alien mother ship or an exploded venus-type planetoid, or a protoplanet ejected from a white dwarf shedding its outer layer. Just NOT a comet. (2) NASA is no longer a trusted source for science.
Where were NASA when needed? On holiday ... They used the "I'm your best friend, call me anytime you need me. I'm not there" trick. NASA chose to support fascism over science, undoing 50 years of marketing that sold them as the No 1 trusted place to go for scientific fact ... except when needed.
November 2, 2025 at 3:55 AM
Where were NASA when needed? On holiday ... They used the "I'm your best friend, call me anytime you need me. I'm not there" trick. NASA chose to support fascism over science, undoing 50 years of marketing that sold them as the No 1 trusted place to go for scientific fact ... except when needed.