Peter Mc Daid
banner
petermcdaid.bsky.social
Peter Mc Daid
@petermcdaid.bsky.social
lotsa interests, fairly-ambidextrous. Feel I'm pretty well-adjusted until faced with self-checkout. Swings, roundabouts.
models always get acting work. She was a good musician and should have pursued that road. (doesn't pay as well, tho)
December 9, 2025 at 2:12 PM
stop using 'fulsome' incorrectly, please. It's driving me bananas. @reuters.com
December 7, 2025 at 11:28 PM
I sent my nieces £12 worth of doo-dads for their birthdays, filled out all the new paperwork, paid the duty. That was in September. They've never received the package. I know this is happening and shipments are being destroyed, but...why??
November 27, 2025 at 10:52 AM
this was every single day walking in LA. Looking left for oncoming traffic and driving into pedestrians. It has to be banned.
November 26, 2025 at 10:59 PM
there is certainly a time and a place to discuss regulations on electrified bicycles, but not when the driver of a 3000lb vehicle fails to yield to oncoming traffic when making a left hand turn.
November 25, 2025 at 11:54 AM
this driver failed to yield to oncoming traffic while making a left-hand turn. This is not about bicycle, nor e-bike, safety.
November 24, 2025 at 10:56 AM
has he made any comments on Nicklaus's manhood?
November 23, 2025 at 9:56 AM
the driver is clearly at fault. This is hardly worth discussion.
November 23, 2025 at 1:28 AM
don't worry, DJT has a great track record tackling pandemics.
November 22, 2025 at 8:49 AM
'we're the party of law and order'. right. Be ashamed to have that 'R' after your name. I hope it haunts him.
November 20, 2025 at 11:18 PM
you should 'both sides' this issue in your next post.
November 20, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Oh I've heard it before - 'both sides', re-writing of events to fit your criticism of a process that depends on numbers, not 'vibes'. It is lazy and I can't take you seriously, whatsoever.
November 16, 2025 at 11:02 AM
riiiight...again, the 'GOP's plan' that the GOP is currently working to dismantle? This backwards supposition and re-writing of history doesn't make you look intelligent, it just makes you a troll. 'Both sides' is lazy, unserious, and deadly for progressive politics.
November 15, 2025 at 10:57 AM
he didn't have the votes, plain and simple. If this was what 'corporate Republicans already wanted to do', they wouldn't have tried to repeal it fifty times or defund the subsidies - you, know, the shutdown from all of...last week? Honestly, this is why Anonymous & its both sides BS is so dangerous
November 15, 2025 at 10:08 AM
this handle 'both sides-ing' again, ad nauseam, as the current 'leader' defunds USAID resulting in a projected 600K deaths, starves Americans, kidnaps people off the streets, sends troops into American cities, re-starts nuclear testing, accepts bribes from terror-sponsoring states, etc, etc, etc...
November 15, 2025 at 10:03 AM
not even if I put it in all caps?
November 12, 2025 at 1:07 PM
clearly not a good one.
November 12, 2025 at 9:15 AM
yeah, again. They muse on this on the podcast.
November 12, 2025 at 9:00 AM
I have this on regular rotation. No talking points allowed.
November 12, 2025 at 8:59 AM