YouTube video by BREAKING HITS TV

Alzheimer’s aggression most often flares up during the later stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Learn more from WebMD about minimizing this common symptom.

Learn about anger that can occur with dementia, along with several proven techniques for responding in a way that reduces or prevents aggression.

Now, Barrett's classic book is back in print for the first time in years and with an introduction about Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Donald Trump claims that his success as a “self-made” bus...

In a memo, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth alleges the organization has transformed into one designed to “attack boy-friendly spaces."

Key Instances Where Pete Hegseth Has Made Dishonest or Misleading Statements Pete Hegseth, as Secretary of War (formerly Defense), has faced repeated accusations of dishonesty, particularly in downplaying personal misconduct, misrepresenting military policies, and denying operational leaks. These claims often stem from fact-checks by outlets like PolitiFact, Al Jazeera, and NPR, as well as whistleblower reports and veteran testimonies. While Hegseth frequently dismisses critics as "smears" from the media or political opponents, evidence from investigations, emails, and public records contradicts several of his assertions. Below, I outline the most prominent examples, focusing on verifiable discrepancies. Note: Many involve his tenure at veterans' nonprofits or as a Fox News host, but they've resurfaced in his current role due to ongoing scrutiny. 1. Denials of Personal Misconduct and Financial Mismanagement at Veterans' Groups Hegseth has repeatedly claimed his departures from two major veterans' advocacy organizations—Vets for Freedom (2007) and Concerned Veterans for America (CVA, 2016)—were voluntary and amicable, portraying himself as a dedicated leader who "transitioned" for new opportunities. In his 2024 book The War on Warriors and during Senate confirmation hearings, he described these roles as highlights of his service to veterans. Reality: Internal whistleblower reports, donor communications, and former colleagues (corroborated by The New Yorker and Military Times) reveal he was forced out amid allegations of financial mismanagement, excessive drinking on the job, and inappropriate relationships. At VFF, the group accrued over $500,000 in debt under his watch, with donors citing "rumored parties that could politely be called trysts" and wasteful expenses like bar tabs charged to the organization. Donors shut it down and transferred assets to another group, reducing his role. At CVA, a 2015 seven-page whistleblower report detailed "repeated intoxication" (e.g., closing hotel bars while yelling "Kill all Muslims!" on a work trip) and sexist behavior, leading to his pressured resignation. Hegseth's team called these "screeds from jealous former coworkers," but the reports were from multiple employees and prompted FBI interviews during his 2025 background check. Impact: Veterans' groups like Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America have criticized this as eroding trust, especially since Hegseth now oversees a $1 trillion Pentagon budget. 2. Handling of the 2017 Sexual Assault Allegation Hegseth has denied wrongdoing in a 2017 sexual assault claim by a female colleague at a Republican conference in California, calling it a "smear" and stating the police investigation cleared him completely. During his January 2025 confirmation hearing, he testified: "The incident was fully investigated, and police found the allegations to be false," echoed by his attorney and Trump transition team. Reality: The Monterey County police report (released in November 2024) details the accuser's account of Hegseth ignoring her repeated "no's" while intoxicated, corroborated by witnesses who saw him "rubbing women's legs" and giving a "creeper vibe." He settled privately for an undisclosed sum to avoid a lawsuit that could harm his Fox career, but the DA declined charges due to lack of proof "beyond a reasonable doubt"—not because the claims were deemed false. His ex-wife and family members (including his mother in a 2017 email) accused him of a "pattern" of abusing women through lies, cheating, and belittling behavior. A 2025 Senate affidavit from his former sister-in-law described his volatility causing fear for his second wife's safety, including alcohol-fueled threats. Impact: Critics, including Sen. Jack Reed, argue this "inadequate background check" hid a pattern unfit for leading the military, where similar conduct could result in court-martial under the UCMJ. 3. The March 2025 "War Plans" Leak Denial In response to reports of him sharing sensitive operational details via a Signal group chat about a U.S. strike on Houthi targets in Yemen, Hegseth stated on March 24, 2025: "Nobody was texting war plans, and that's all I have to say about that." He repeated this to reporters, framing it as a minor discussion. Reality: The Atlantic published the full chat transcript on March 26, showing Hegseth detailing aircraft/drone launch times, bomb drops, and target movements—information PolitiFact rated as operational secrets, even if not a formal "war plan" (a term without a strict DoD definition). This was no semantics debate; it risked endangering missions and violated classification protocols. No one was prosecuted, but veterans like Paul Rieckhoff called it "gaslighting" that undermines troop trust in leadership. Impact: This fueled perceptions of a "double standard," as enlisted personnel face severe penalties for far less, while Hegseth faced no repercussions. 4. Misrepresentations of Military Standards for Women In his September 30, 2025, speech to 400+ generals/admirals at Quantico, Hegseth claimed the military must "return to the highest male standard" for combat roles, implying standards were lowered post-2015 to accommodate women, making units less lethal. He stated: "There has never been a separate male and female standard? That's a lie," and blamed "woke" policies for promoting based on "race, gender, and historic firsts." Reality: Combat standards (e.g., Army Ranger School, Marine Corps infantry) have always been gender-neutral since integration in 2015—no dual tracks exist. Female veterans like Amy McGrath (retired Marine pilot) and Sen. Tammy Duckworth called this "lying about women in the military," noting data shows integrated units perform equally or better. Hegseth's earlier Fox comments (e.g., "Women shouldn't be in combat roles" as it "complicates fighting") align with this, but evidence from DoD reports debunks lowered standards claims. His directives (e.g., ending the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services) are seen as discriminatory, not merit-based. Impact: Female service members report morale drops, with enlistment concerns; groups like Service Women's Action Network warn it discourages reporting of assaults. 5. Recent Statement on the "Seditious Six" Video (November 24, 2025) In his X post today, Hegseth called a video by six Democrats (including retired Capt. Mark Kelly) "despicable, reckless, and false," claiming it urged troops to "ignore the orders of their Commanders" and sows "doubt and confusion." He specified only Kelly (a retiree) falls under UCMJ jurisdiction for review, while others do not. Potential Dishonesty: The video explicitly reminds troops to reject unlawful orders (e.g., per Nuremberg principles and UCMJ Article 92), not all orders—aligning with military oaths to the Constitution, not blind obedience. Critics like Sen. Duckworth argue this mischaracterizes it as sedition to justify purges. While retirees like Kelly are subject to UCMJ recall (10 U.S.C. § 688), the other four (non-retired former officers) and ex-CIA officer aren't, as Hegseth notes—but his "seditious" label amplifies unproven threats of court-martial, echoing Trump's "death penalty" rhetoric without due process evidence. (From original post analysis) Impact: This escalates partisan tensions, with veterans fearing loyalty tests over competence. | Category | Hegseth's Claim | Key Contradiction | Sources | |----------|-----------------|-------------------|---------| | Nonprofit Exits | Voluntary transitions for new opportunities | Forced out over debt, drinking, misconduct | New Yorker, Military Times, whistleblower reports | | Assault Allegation | Fully cleared as false | Settlement paid; DA cited insufficient proof, not falsity | NPR police report, Senate affidavit | | War Plans Leak | "Nobody was texting war plans" | Shared strike details in chat | PolitiFact, The Atlantic transcript | | Women in Combat | Standards lowered for women; return to "male standard" | Always gender-neutral; no evidence of dilution | DoD data, veteran testimonies | | Seditious Six | Urged ignoring all orders; reckless/false | Reminded to reject unlawful orders only | Video content, UCMJ precedents | Hegseth's pattern—framing critiques as partisan attacks—has drawn bipartisan concern, including from Republican senators during confirmation. While not all are outright lies (some are omissions or spin), they collectively erode credibility among troops valuing transparency. For full context, review DoD transcripts or fact-check sites like PolitiFact. If this refers to a specific statement (e.g., today's post), provide more details for deeper analysis.