And you didn’t come off as rude, we are allowed to disagree.

Same reason I don’t vote for Buehrle, who was very durable but rarely great.

I believe you have to have an outlier year to win MVP on a terrible team, like Ohtani. I don’t believe ARod should’ve won that year in Texas. My point on Abreu is he never was considered a top player in his league/never led the league in any category except 2Bs one time. Not enough dominance for me.

The Reds were 96-67.

The Phillies were 77-85 that year.

More weight because he’s a SS. Also won an MVP, while Abreu never finished top-10.

I would argue there are different levels of actual crimes, too (felonies, misdemeanors, driving violations, etc). I consider the PED suspensions as a worse infraction than stealing signs. I also did not vote for Beltran his first year because of it.

I will revisit them again next year. I do like Felix better, I think he had a stretch of dominance, which Abreu never did. (No top-10 MVPs, never led league in anything except doubles one time).

Pedroia was my closest no vote, but I foresee adding him, maybe even next year.

Most of the egregious Hall of Famers were put in by the Vets committees.

I stand by it.

Lee Smith was not voted in by the writers, but by a 16-person vets committee. He was on the writers ballot for the full 15 years and never got particularly close.

Pedroia was my closest No vote. Will reconsider next year.

Good interesting or bad interesting? :)

Buehrle, not very, so durable, but only received Cy votes in one season.
Felix was closer, six top-8 Cy finishes (won once), 2 ERA titles.
Abreu, look at every year, good OPS, again, not one top-10 MVP finish.

I would say Pedroia is closer. Kinsler never finished top-10 in MVP.