I'm not Pete—this is an unofficial account. But just so you know:

He clarified his position on Politico:

Pete supports a weapons ban on Israel, and a two-state solution.

I'm not Pete, this an unofficial account, but just so you know:

Pete noticed the backlash, and he clarified his position on Politico:

He supports a weapons ban on Israel, and a two state solution.

I've really been trying not to respond, but the sheer invalidity of this response is forcing me to. So, one last response it is.

1. Do you know what "some" means?
2. You said you would beat me into the ground on ethics, but then how do YOU have a device to use bluesky?

Again, going back to the "We should stop arguing", neither of us are getting anywhere.

You can respond to what I said, or you don't. I'm not going to make any more responses though.

1. You don't know if I choose to donate some of my money or not.
2. If you're going to use generosity in an argument, it becomes stale. Generosity shouldn't benefit you, only others—that's why being generous is considered kind.
3. I'm glad you give money away, but you still didn't refute my point.

Quite normal?

That's a problem if you call this quite normal.

I'm not going to argue with somebody who cares more about decreasing the costs of fighting, than about civilian casualties.

Not much security. Israel can do targeted strikes.

There will always be civilian casualties, that is the sad truth about war, but doing targeted strikes would significantly reduce civilian casualties, while still being able to fight hamas.

I was referring to both Palestinian and Israeli casualties?

Destroying Hamas will stop Israeli civilian deaths, but they need to be precise to limit Palestinian civilian deaths too.

👍

I'm glad we can agree civilian casualties are bad.

You know what? I think we should just stop.

Neither of us are getting anywhere.

Can we just take a moment to appreciate how two people with an almost opposite stance on an issue can still support Pete? I think that goes to show how much support he has.

Also, for simplicity, can we just use one chain to argue, instead of a bunch of separate chains?

Funny joke.

You are acting like Israel is this holy figure, despite them bombing universities, deciding to not do precision strikes (which they can do, and shows that they are trying to wipe out civilians), and did you ever consider that they actually are trying to intentionally kill civilians?

Oh the hypocrisy is funny...