Orlando J. Pérez
banner
perez1oj.bsky.social
Orlando J. Pérez
@perez1oj.bsky.social
Professor of Political Science @ University of North Texas at Dallas. Writing about Latin America, civil-military relations, democracy, security, and public opinion.
Traveling as much as time permits! 🌎✈️
Do “normies” watch late night TV?
September 17, 2025 at 11:26 PM
And Mulino has already made his strategic decision: US is the preferred partner…🤷🏻‍♂️
August 22, 2025 at 3:02 PM
9/ These Latin American examples show the pitfalls of turning soldiers into policemen. They often blur institutional boundaries, weaken civilian policing, and chip away at democratic norms.
August 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
8/ Effectiveness vs. legitimacy: Militarization can reduce visible crime in the short term but often degrades investigative capacity and police professionalism, which harms long-run security. #Mexico’s expansion of military roles beyond security further weakens civilian institutions.
August 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
7/ Rule-of-law trade-offs: States of exception or NIAC (non-international armed conflict) labels, as declared in #Ecuador, can lower rights protections and judicial scrutiny.
August 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
6/ In #ElSalvador, sustained militarized policing consolidates executive dominance, sidelines judicial oversight, and habituates the armed forces and police to extraordinary powers.
August 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
5/ Outcomes on crime are mixed; the governance trade-offs are clearer. #Mexico’s security policy under #AMLO normalized military roles far beyond policing, concentrating budgets and administrative tasks in the armed forces and weakening civilian agencies.
August 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
4/ Repeated internal missions expand military leverage over civilians. #Brazil’s GLO (Garantia da Lei e da Ordem) gives the presidency a legal on-ramp to grant soldiers temporary police powers. While GLO should be “episodic.” The practice has become a feature of Brazilian democracy.
August 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
3/ Militarized policing is politically attractive yet institutionally costly. Publics often trust armies more than police, which tempts executives to deploy soldiers for street crime and order maintenance. That choice tends to raise the risk of abuses, blur accountability, and slow police reform.
August 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
2/ Domestic deployments of military forces risk undermining civilian control and normalizing the use of force in everyday governance. Latin America provides plenty of evidence for the corrosive effect of militarizing public security. www.crisisgroup.org/latin-americ...
The Generals’ Labyrinth: Crime and the Military in Mexico | International Crisis Group
Mexico’s outgoing president has deployed more soldiers than ever to fight crime. But levels of violence remain high. His successor should set limits to the military’s role in public safety while worki...
www.crisisgroup.org
August 12, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Deploying the National Guard to DC over crime rates that are actually falling isn’t about safety—it’s about politics. Militarizing domestic policing erodes civilian control & normalizes troops in the streets. That’s a dangerous precedent in a democracy.
August 11, 2025 at 3:48 PM