banner
percyjones.bsky.social
@percyjones.bsky.social
Nice to see someone so thrilled! Congrats.
January 5, 2026 at 4:40 AM
Silly to say that to someone who is incapable of learning.
January 4, 2026 at 3:45 AM
But if he would chafe under the judge (sorry, I can't remember his name), that would be a good thing. And Mamdani can handle it.
January 4, 2026 at 1:03 AM
Original indictment from 2020 was in SDNY. Apparently it went before a judge who may still be assigned. Appointed by Clinton and denied, twice, Trump's attempts to move NY fraud case to federal court. He also said it might go to Miami. But jurisprudence is not his strong suit.
January 4, 2026 at 1:01 AM
Trump: I watched an attack on sovereignty."
January 3, 2026 at 5:18 PM
From the Kristi Noem shop. Complain to her.
January 3, 2026 at 3:44 AM
Lovely.
January 3, 2026 at 3:44 AM
The worst part is that DHS probably gave them the graphics.
January 3, 2026 at 3:14 AM
Wouldn't the crackdown on liberal groups be most effective closer to the election? Starting in a few months? Maybe around the time of the next "No Kings" protests?
January 1, 2026 at 3:07 AM
A hopeful writing for New Years eve. I will hope.
January 1, 2026 at 2:49 AM
I still do.
December 31, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Yes, it was a great conversation.
December 31, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Seems odd to me to pin the issue to ethics and corruption since the time of Dobbs and never mention the leaked "draft" opinion .
December 31, 2025 at 3:06 AM
Is this also Politico's way of downplaying Spanberger's win?
December 29, 2025 at 9:29 PM
But acknowledging that SG cited it in his brief will give Alito and Thomas a circular argument to hang their hats on.
December 29, 2025 at 12:46 AM
The first article, particularly, is a great read. I wish the people (men) who are so insistent on bemoaning what our society has done to young, white men would pay better attention to reality and stop relying on anecdotal evidence.
December 27, 2025 at 3:30 AM
He may not be ideological, but he was registered as I recall. As he is now as a Republican.
December 26, 2025 at 5:06 PM
1. Agree, but I was stoned when I read it.
2. Definitely.
3. Sure, why not? Not sure it will be an enlightening answer.
December 26, 2025 at 3:47 AM
Sorry I'm not knowledgeable enough, or funny, but are we really starting a new Crusade?
December 26, 2025 at 3:45 AM
Finally! Some reality will be brought to the situation.
December 26, 2025 at 3:44 AM
I'm asking why, if I pay for ad-free viewing, I get ads.
December 26, 2025 at 3:30 AM
Also my first job, back in the '60s, working for USNWR. Only not local since I was on foreign desk. Read NYT, WaPo, CSM and all the wire services. Pure pleasure.
December 26, 2025 at 2:30 AM
Because now truth is prejudicial.
December 26, 2025 at 2:29 AM