Ok.. I’ll have a better think about it and try that in the morning. Really struggling to understand anything different at present but glad you’ve clarified I got it all wrong..
interesting read all the same..
good night

So that people like me don’t pick you up wrong?

Ok Anton.. thanks for clarifying that I got it wrong..
any chance you could elaborate what you meant by the following line:
‘According to the RSA, in the vast majority of pedestrian deaths, the pedestrian is culpable: not wearing hi-vis’

And just to clarify, I do of course recommend high vis and not saying for a second it couldn’t save someone’s life..

Ok glad you clarified that.. I honestly feel the general description of victims of road deaths being culpable because they weren’t wearing high vis needs proper examination because most pedestrians do not wear high vis and don’t expect to be killed..

You’ve indicated that a pedestrian who doesn’t wear high vis clothing is culpable for their death if hit by a vehicle. So I’m asking if you are ever a pedestrian, do you always wear high vis clothing?

Do you always wear high vis clothing if you go for a run or a walk?

Glad to see you on this platform!!