payitnomind.bsky.social
@payitnomind.bsky.social
November 20, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Charles

It's basic biology

It is just excruciating to see someone sooooooo wrong being soooooo patronizing.
November 19, 2025 at 3:09 PM
"I never said they were"

It is pretty pointless having a discussion with someone who freely lies, constantly shifts the goalposts, and is unable to acknowledge and correct their own misunderstandings
November 19, 2025 at 2:43 PM
She-ing is a word ffs

lithub.com/the-feints-a...
November 18, 2025 at 11:40 PM
Of course this is simply recycled homophobia as used as part of the accusation of "social contagion"

The same hate, the same target, the novel stupidity of those like you buying into it

scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcont...
November 18, 2025 at 11:13 PM
From the Gay Liberation Front Manifesto

1971
November 18, 2025 at 4:28 PM
“oh I suppose everyone who has a different economic opinion is a Nazi now huh?!”
November 16, 2025 at 8:44 PM
IIRC the scope of your scientific reading is unfortunately limited due to the access costs. 🤷‍♀️

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
November 15, 2025 at 8:49 PM
I'm unclear how the SRY test works in this situation 🤔
November 12, 2025 at 10:36 AM
the prejudice expert has checked in
November 2, 2025 at 11:06 PM
You appear to be suggesting that 457 is less than 100.

Depressing that the mental contortions of transphobia lead you to simply dismiss the severe levels of violence that trans people routinely experience through this pathetic whataboutery. Crass, cold, and cruel.
November 2, 2025 at 6:56 PM
This is an article that literally discusses the strong case for a “noncategorical” approach, btw

Do you not read the hand-me-down citations that you parrot?
May 31, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Your own citation - which uses outdated and stigmatising terminology - does not agree with you
May 31, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Me: pointing out that a gene isn't "for" something if it that something is not, in fact, instantiated by that gene

You:
February 28, 2025 at 5:03 PM
None of that implies therefore that biological sex is defined in terms of "what would have happened if it had but it didn't but should of", which is actually the mast you've tied yourself to
February 28, 2025 at 12:33 PM
remember when GCs confidently proclaimed that certain roles in ballet could only be performed by "biological women" and got ripped for it by people that actually knew anything about ballet?
February 26, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Why isn't this called the "DSD pride flag" Charles
February 26, 2025 at 2:37 PM