Inspired by Murphy v. Schmidt?

But those are your top line points if you’re pleased or silver-lining pleased (“tickled”) with the outcome. Assuming the NYT’s hasn’t selectively quoted and butchered the context here, I think Kate’s got this right.

Hey Matt—Not sure I agree with this take. If you’re principally concerned with the ensuing catastrophe, your top line points there aren’t “republicans will be haunted by this” and “we’ll make sure no one forgets who’s responsible;” they’re about the scope and magnitude of the ensuing catastrophe.

Does “the semblance of due process that is the foundation of our constitutional order” just scan wrong or is it the truest thing that’s ever been said about another thing

The world where Boasberg refers prosecution to Jenner or Perkins and Paul Weiss et al defend Trump pro bono is the funniest of all possible worlds