paulutrecht.bsky.social
paulutrecht.bsky.social
@paulutrecht.bsky.social
That is so sad!!
December 1, 2025 at 4:13 AM
Is that enough for jurisdiction? Will US recognize that jurisdiction?
November 30, 2025 at 6:40 AM
Mike: I love you. I wish you were right. But US did not sign treaty giving The Hague authority to try American military.
November 30, 2025 at 5:20 AM
Yes. Unfortunately. Those people want to set that example for China. Each superpower can do anything in its sphere of influence. Europe is not a super power.
November 29, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Turn off the law brain — just one day!!
November 28, 2025 at 1:57 AM
How did his wife get a security clearance?
November 26, 2025 at 11:59 PM
It will be a lot worse. Many of the Stalinists had real power after Stalin died. I expect that Trump’s minions will be in jail or in disgrace. None of them will have any power.
November 24, 2025 at 3:46 AM
I agree with you on the facts. You cannot expect the trigger pullers to suffer a court martial based on news reports when they do not know the classified information.
November 24, 2025 at 3:25 AM
Sorry, you cannot know that in a way that would justify the trigger puller refusing to follow the order.
November 24, 2025 at 3:23 AM
The trigger pullers know what we know (based on publicly available information, it sure seems illegal). But, they do not have access to all the classified reports. In theory, those reports could justify the strikes. That was my initial point: start prosecuting at the top of the chain of command.
November 23, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Mark hertling wrote an article explaining that enlisted troops take an oath (to follow orders) and officers take a different oath (to follow lawful orders). Officers have training and information that is way beyond that available to the enlisted troops.
November 23, 2025 at 8:05 PM
I do not disagree. But we need the opposite of the DOJ strategy with J6. Start at the top, not the bottom. The generals giving the orders knew they were illegal — a lot more so than the individual troops.
November 23, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Rudy Giuliani. He ran for President and she did a profile of him.
November 22, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Or, minus 5 seats!
November 22, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Two words is too many?
November 20, 2025 at 3:22 AM
She admitted to making a bribe!
November 18, 2025 at 8:54 PM
It is not a hostile work environment if the conduct is welcomed by the employee.
November 18, 2025 at 1:59 AM
Are you going to tell us about her affair with Giuliani?
November 18, 2025 at 1:52 AM
They should all be consulting with criminal lawyers to make sure that they are not committing crimes.
November 15, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Sell his policy to me. I will pay $10.
November 15, 2025 at 2:55 AM
The temporary judge is bound by same rules of procedure and evidence as a regular judge trial. The decision is subject to appeal — like a judgment after a court trial. Arbitrators have leeway to do what they want instead of what the law requires.
November 13, 2025 at 10:53 PM
This is common in California business transactions. The CA rules allow appointment of a temporary judge, who decides case without a jury. In CA, jury waivers are not allowed before a case is filed. The temporary judge is better than an arbitration because . . .
November 13, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Everyone who dealt with Epstein should have their turn in the barrel!!
November 13, 2025 at 6:14 AM
Hillary Clinton!
November 13, 2025 at 6:06 AM
Dig him up and get him to rat out his blackmail victims!
November 13, 2025 at 2:40 AM