No accountability and, usually, the flaws are bizarre and unpredictable to non researchers (well, and sometimes to us)

And the very first comment on that LinkedIn post says well, human reviewers make mistakes, too. So… what’s the point of the AI review then?!

Kinda tempted to get back on twitter just to reply “skill issue” to everything musky says…

I’m still trying to figure out who would pay enough money for this sort of ai for it to turn a profit. Apparently the $200/month plans aren’t enough to cover costs. (I wouldn’t give it $20/month myself)

I’ll try to get the robots to go all battlestar galactica but no promises… funding is a little tight right now, after all.

Wait are we not in that already?!

Where do I have to move to vote for you?

Sounds like a good time to make an ai that tests for top down bias. (We can just return true because there are no unbiased datasets) (or false for the premium edition)

Surely this is representative of his entire life, other evidence notwithstanding….

If you burn down a forest, you don't miss out on lumber for just that season. You have to replant all the trees, nurture them, and wait for them to grow.

The science and research budget cuts happening now are wanton, senseless arson. Recovery, if it ever happens, will take generations.