But if I were to ask, what was the British moral superiority in overthrowing a democratic leader who intended to nationalise oil for the benefit of the people?
So BP could keep on stealing it.
But if I were to ask, what was the British moral superiority in overthrowing a democratic leader who intended to nationalise oil for the benefit of the people?
So BP could keep on stealing it.
It's a simple historical fact.
It's a simple historical fact.
I have already corrected you on this.
Try scrolling back and reading again.
I have already corrected you on this.
Try scrolling back and reading again.
No, actions have consequences, and the coup to replace a democracy with a monarchist dictatorship paved the way for the revolution.
"It has been almost uniquely free from Western influence"
Sure it has:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYAr...
No, actions have consequences, and the coup to replace a democracy with a monarchist dictatorship paved the way for the revolution.
"It has been almost uniquely free from Western influence"
Sure it has:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYAr...
UK (2016) Should we remain in the EU? Yes/No.
Iran(1979) Should Iran be ruled by Islamic law? Yes/No.
UK (2016) Should we remain in the EU? Yes/No.
Iran(1979) Should Iran be ruled by Islamic law? Yes/No.
Yes, it is.
But why do you keep saying *The West* when its is the US/UK?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqMs...
Yes, it is.
But why do you keep saying *The West* when its is the US/UK?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqMs...
You seem to have some difficulty in comprehending English.
I clearly stated that the beginning of the protests were economic and then widened
'West bad'
Too Iranians, the US is indeed bad. It instigated the 1953 coup and assisted Saddam in killing thousands of Iranians
You seem to have some difficulty in comprehending English.
I clearly stated that the beginning of the protests were economic and then widened
'West bad'
Too Iranians, the US is indeed bad. It instigated the 1953 coup and assisted Saddam in killing thousands of Iranians
That they grew into larger protests against the regime isn't in doubt.
What's also not in doubt is that this was the US waging economic warfare.
That they grew into larger protests against the regime isn't in doubt.
What's also not in doubt is that this was the US waging economic warfare.
Monarchy is a lost cause.
And with advocates like you, it's easy to see why.
Monarchy is a lost cause.
And with advocates like you, it's easy to see why.
Honestly, you monarchists are just as bad as religious zealots in your relationship with the truth.
Honestly, you monarchists are just as bad as religious zealots in your relationship with the truth.
It's bullshit that the US helped Iraq slaughter Iranians?
It's bullshit that US sanctions were deliberate economic warfare to instigate regime change?
It's bullshit that the US helped Iraq slaughter Iranians?
It's bullshit that US sanctions were deliberate economic warfare to instigate regime change?
Americans," I wonder why they hate us?"
Because America might have forgotten what they did, but the Iranians haven't.
Americans," I wonder why they hate us?"
Because America might have forgotten what they did, but the Iranians haven't.
"You’re carrying water for western hatred"
I'm not, but I can explain it
From an Iranian in Iran, last week---->
"You’re carrying water for western hatred"
I'm not, but I can explain it
From an Iranian in Iran, last week---->
What would you have people do?
The protests in Iran were instigated by the West ( esp the USA) as economic warfare to create a demand for regime change.
What would you have people do?
The protests in Iran were instigated by the West ( esp the USA) as economic warfare to create a demand for regime change.
Nonsense.
Only Christians have attacked Jews.
In Islam, "People of the Book" (Ahl al-Kitab)
refers to religious groups, primarily Jews and Christians, who follow divine scriptures (Torah, Gospels) revealed before the Quran.
Nonsense.
Only Christians have attacked Jews.
In Islam, "People of the Book" (Ahl al-Kitab)
refers to religious groups, primarily Jews and Christians, who follow divine scriptures (Torah, Gospels) revealed before the Quran.
Michelle"At some points, Muslims did welcome Jews. Because they knew Jews were good at business" <----
This is a Christian anti-semitic trope that dates from the time when Christians and Muslims forbade usury & relied on Jews to lend money with interest.
Michelle"At some points, Muslims did welcome Jews. Because they knew Jews were good at business" <----
This is a Christian anti-semitic trope that dates from the time when Christians and Muslims forbade usury & relied on Jews to lend money with interest.
Then why are you doing it?
Then why are you doing it?
PS, the Philistines aren't Greeks. Philistine is simply another name for Palestine
PS, the Philistines aren't Greeks. Philistine is simply another name for Palestine
Thats a funny way to describe me, quoting what it says in Deuteronomy.
"In Deuteronomy 20:16–17, God commanded the Israelites," Completely destroy them—the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites
Thats a funny way to describe me, quoting what it says in Deuteronomy.
"In Deuteronomy 20:16–17, God commanded the Israelites," Completely destroy them—the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites