I remember this. It looked cool on TV, but didn't work well on the radio. It did sound like it _should sound_ cool as well, but in practice it was hard to hear anything out of it. It sounded like playing an old cassette on a cheap boombox, while the other good performances sounded like playing a CD.

That's why I call "autocorrect" autofalse and as one of the first tasks on a new device turn it off 🙄. I rather have misspelled words that honestly look like misspelled words than falsely correct-looking words that alter my message.

Looks more like a spammer spreading fake stories.

4 / But when looking back, the signs of autism would have always been there, as hindsight.

3 / Diagnoses for autism have increased because it's being tested more. Diagnoses happen after childhood because it doesn't necessarily cause issues until there's some more difficult time in life otherwise, when the "normal" abilities would be needed more.

2 / So it's like different "components" in the brain have physically grown to be different sized compared to each other. Exposure to something shouldn't affect that, unless for some reason it'd only damage a specific part of the brain.

1 / I don't see what that has to do with autism. In my understanding, in autism the brain's different features are just differently weighed, i.e. the person can be better than average at some things, but that's at the cost of being worse at some other things.

Took me a minute to understand what you were saying. Apparently it should have said "...like this as an actual...". That would make more sense to me.

Anyway, yelling and using strong words doesn't necessarily help. Calmer ways of expressing can give much more credibility.

So, in discussion about an article on vulnerability in links to join group chats, you first tell everyone not to click links someone puts in front of them, and a little later you give out a link to some supposed group chat 🤔?

Is this a test or another scam or what😄?

It takes a lot of audacity for two foreign countries to gather to plan about a third country 🤨. Like someone else already said, this has some resemblance with the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact 😠.

Do they even know how all the legitimate payments of a large country look like? I'm sure there'd be things that wouldn't be taking place even at larger companies like SpaceX or Tesla. Will they end up "saving" money by essentially stopping paying some debts? Because that'd end well /s 🙄

2 / Generally, even at worst your internet service provider can't see the contents of your communication -- only with what sites you access.

1 / Nowadays browsers and service-specific apps communicate with sites almost always using encrypted communication. If the connection is not encrypted because the site doesn't support encryption the browser at least shows a warning sign at the address bar.

Also, I think the satellites that would be used by phones are something else than Starlink.

I've only heard that a limited number of high-end phone models can use satellites, mainly for emergency, or sometimes for texting. But satellite capacity is limited and costly, so the terrestrial mobile networks would be used whenever possible.