Paul
@paul9115.bsky.social
This isn’t a party. It’s a one-man show wrapped in a cheap suit of nationalism.
And if history's taught us anything, it's that when one man has all the answers and no one dares question him — that's not democracy. That's déjà vu.
And if history's taught us anything, it's that when one man has all the answers and no one dares question him — that's not democracy. That's déjà vu.
June 5, 2025 at 9:56 AM
This isn’t a party. It’s a one-man show wrapped in a cheap suit of nationalism.
And if history's taught us anything, it's that when one man has all the answers and no one dares question him — that's not democracy. That's déjà vu.
And if history's taught us anything, it's that when one man has all the answers and no one dares question him — that's not democracy. That's déjà vu.
Meanwhile, the chairman of the party admits he had “no idea” what their own policy was. Imagine the chair of any serious political party saying that out loud.
The truth? It doesn’t matter what the policy is — it only matters what Nigel says it is today.
The truth? It doesn’t matter what the policy is — it only matters what Nigel says it is today.
June 5, 2025 at 9:56 AM
Meanwhile, the chairman of the party admits he had “no idea” what their own policy was. Imagine the chair of any serious political party saying that out loud.
The truth? It doesn’t matter what the policy is — it only matters what Nigel says it is today.
The truth? It doesn’t matter what the policy is — it only matters what Nigel says it is today.
Let’s talk about how Reform treats its own.
Rupert Lowe dared to criticise Farage. Within hours he was expelled and reported to the police for “bullying.” The police found no evidence, but the message was clear: step out of line and you're done.
Rupert Lowe dared to criticise Farage. Within hours he was expelled and reported to the police for “bullying.” The police found no evidence, but the message was clear: step out of line and you're done.
June 5, 2025 at 9:56 AM
Let’s talk about how Reform treats its own.
Rupert Lowe dared to criticise Farage. Within hours he was expelled and reported to the police for “bullying.” The police found no evidence, but the message was clear: step out of line and you're done.
Rupert Lowe dared to criticise Farage. Within hours he was expelled and reported to the police for “bullying.” The police found no evidence, but the message was clear: step out of line and you're done.
You say a rare appearance, but he's been to Scotland more times than he's been to Clacton so...
June 2, 2025 at 1:17 PM
You say a rare appearance, but he's been to Scotland more times than he's been to Clacton so...
I mean that's the second part of this mystery isn't it? From my experience the top people in their respective fields don't work for free. They got where they are because they understand their value.
June 2, 2025 at 10:49 AM
I mean that's the second part of this mystery isn't it? From my experience the top people in their respective fields don't work for free. They got where they are because they understand their value.
I'm more than happy to see them consigned to the history books, polls this far out from an election aren't all that helpful. They have years to fix their image (however dishonestly)
But I do hope the trend continues
But I do hope the trend continues
May 21, 2025 at 9:57 AM
I'm more than happy to see them consigned to the history books, polls this far out from an election aren't all that helpful. They have years to fix their image (however dishonestly)
But I do hope the trend continues
But I do hope the trend continues
When even the AI you carefully curated to be your personal echo chamber fucking hates you
May 16, 2025 at 11:58 AM
When even the AI you carefully curated to be your personal echo chamber fucking hates you
Checks and balances exist for a reason. Disabling courts so unconstitutional orders can go unchallenged? That’s not strength—it’s authoritarianism.
May 16, 2025 at 11:52 AM
Checks and balances exist for a reason. Disabling courts so unconstitutional orders can go unchallenged? That’s not strength—it’s authoritarianism.
The Supreme Court’s upcoming decision will determine whether one branch of government can neuter another—shifting the balance of U.S. democracy.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Supreme Court to weigh orders halting Trump’s birthright citizenship ban
The Trump administration asked the justices to narrow or limit nationwide injunctions that stopped its birthright citizenship ban while litigation continues.
www.washingtonpost.com
May 16, 2025 at 11:52 AM
The Supreme Court’s upcoming decision will determine whether one branch of government can neuter another—shifting the balance of U.S. democracy.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Example: Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship was swiftly blocked for likely violating the 14th Amendment.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Supreme court wary of Trump’s bid to restrict US birthright citizenship
Justices began hearing cases stemming from president’s January order in dispute that could expand his power
www.theguardian.com
May 16, 2025 at 11:52 AM
Example: Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship was swiftly blocked for likely violating the 14th Amendment.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
It’s like complaining doctors treat too much smallpox—during a smallpox outbreak. Increased court intervention is a reaction to increased executive overreach.
May 16, 2025 at 11:52 AM
It’s like complaining doctors treat too much smallpox—during a smallpox outbreak. Increased court intervention is a reaction to increased executive overreach.
The spike in injunctions corresponds with a surge in legally dubious executive orders. Since re-election, Trump has signed dozens—sparking 200+ lawsuits.
www.reuters.com/graphics/USA...
www.reuters.com/graphics/USA...
How Trump unleashed executive power
President Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office have been marked by a surge in executive actions unseen from any modern U.S. president.
www.reuters.com
May 16, 2025 at 11:52 AM
The spike in injunctions corresponds with a surge in legally dubious executive orders. Since re-election, Trump has signed dozens—sparking 200+ lawsuits.
www.reuters.com/graphics/USA...
www.reuters.com/graphics/USA...
I don't think this is real. You're telling me throughout that entire interview he didn't once make reference to the world woke web?
May 14, 2025 at 10:21 AM
I don't think this is real. You're telling me throughout that entire interview he didn't once make reference to the world woke web?
For the first time in my life I find myself politically homeless. I can't in good faith support this government
May 12, 2025 at 7:41 PM
For the first time in my life I find myself politically homeless. I can't in good faith support this government
Final thoughts? Labour doesn’t need to mimic Reform UK. It needs to lead.
You can secure borders without criminalising compassion. You can uphold the law without undermining human rights.
This bill? It's not left. It's not centre. It's a swing toward authoritarianism.
You can secure borders without criminalising compassion. You can uphold the law without undermining human rights.
This bill? It's not left. It's not centre. It's a swing toward authoritarianism.
May 12, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Final thoughts? Labour doesn’t need to mimic Reform UK. It needs to lead.
You can secure borders without criminalising compassion. You can uphold the law without undermining human rights.
This bill? It's not left. It's not centre. It's a swing toward authoritarianism.
You can secure borders without criminalising compassion. You can uphold the law without undermining human rights.
This bill? It's not left. It's not centre. It's a swing toward authoritarianism.
And yes, it repeals Tory Rwanda policies. But don’t cheer too hard. Much of that cruelty is being quietly repackaged.
This isn’t a pivot toward compassion. It’s just a more polished boot stamping down harder, but with better PR.
This isn’t a pivot toward compassion. It’s just a more polished boot stamping down harder, but with better PR.
May 12, 2025 at 6:07 PM
And yes, it repeals Tory Rwanda policies. But don’t cheer too hard. Much of that cruelty is being quietly repackaged.
This isn’t a pivot toward compassion. It’s just a more polished boot stamping down harder, but with better PR.
This isn’t a pivot toward compassion. It’s just a more polished boot stamping down harder, but with better PR.
Introducing the "Border Security Commander." Sounds neutral, right? Wrong.
This person will have centralised control over border enforcement — answering directly to the Home Secretary. That's a political post overseeing operational law enforcement.
This person will have centralised control over border enforcement — answering directly to the Home Secretary. That's a political post overseeing operational law enforcement.
May 12, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Introducing the "Border Security Commander." Sounds neutral, right? Wrong.
This person will have centralised control over border enforcement — answering directly to the Home Secretary. That's a political post overseeing operational law enforcement.
This person will have centralised control over border enforcement — answering directly to the Home Secretary. That's a political post overseeing operational law enforcement.