Paroxeteen
paroxiteen.bsky.social
Paroxeteen
@paroxiteen.bsky.social
Influencee, thought-follower. Living in two blue oases in two deep red states. Inventor, EE, erstwhile mathematician, exhausted and despondent liberal.
Also, the Politico piece skipped some of the seedier stuff about Summers’s behavior.
November 18, 2025 at 4:40 AM
Eloquent as always, Hat, but really potent, too.
November 18, 2025 at 4:35 AM
I haven't yet met a Dem whose response to the warning that there are likely several prominent Dems in the files was not something along the lines of "Fuck 'em. Anyone who raped kids should fry."
November 17, 2025 at 9:54 PM
I felt for sure that we were in the end-game during the Mueller and Smith probes, but the media landscape now is so different from the one that existed during Watergate. I fear that without real video of Trump deep-throating Clinton, the fuck-weasel will skate.
November 17, 2025 at 9:49 PM
I just learned the term for the 250th anniversary: semiquincentennial. I'll use it in a sentence. It's fucking tragic that that moron Trump is president for our semiquincentennial.
November 17, 2025 at 9:46 PM
FWIW, I know a few radical literary critics who are actually rather pragmatic in their actual approaches to politics. They understand the difference between aspiration and pragmatism. Their writing explores Utopian ideals and yet they know not to throw away their vote, for example.
November 17, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Serious question: do we know if there's a system in place to make sure that official archives haven't been modified? For example, a digital signature (e.g., md5 or SHA-1) that is entered into the records and archived (with time and date stamps) along with the documents themselves?
November 17, 2025 at 6:40 PM
At the very least, AI can make dumb luck less expensive. I've made a few discoveries/breakthroughs by serendipity or completely by accident.
November 17, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Hey, sometimes if you wanna make an omelette, you've got to do some racial profiling.
November 17, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Serious question: do we know if there's a system in place to make sure that official archives haven't been modified? For example, a digital signature (e.g., md5 or SHA-1) that is entered into the records and archived (with time and date stamps) along with the documents themselves?
November 17, 2025 at 4:44 PM
You know "the media" pretty well, I would assume. What do you think the chances are that their coverage reflects this shift in strategy? Teen Vogue? Maybe. NYT and WaPo? I wouldn't get my hopes up.
November 17, 2025 at 3:51 PM
November 17, 2025 at 5:02 AM
November 17, 2025 at 12:33 AM
November 17, 2025 at 12:15 AM
November 15, 2025 at 11:55 PM
November 15, 2025 at 11:04 PM
November 15, 2025 at 10:52 PM
This is guaranteed to drive the trads bonkers. I bet JD and Dreher blow a gasket.
November 14, 2025 at 8:29 PM
It also looks like an overhead view of Trump blowing Clinton.
November 14, 2025 at 8:28 PM
November 14, 2025 at 8:26 PM
I used to comfort myself with the thought that even though our elected leaders are morons, there are probably experts behind the scenes guiding policy. I'm not sure that's true anymore.
November 14, 2025 at 8:24 PM
Even though it'll never happen, I wish this would provide impetus for Mueller to break his silence and set the record straight.
November 14, 2025 at 3:34 PM
November 14, 2025 at 3:21 PM