I see facets and implications that weigh in different directions, but is the objection about public funds, or about symbolism, power, and taste?
I see facets and implications that weigh in different directions, but is the objection about public funds, or about symbolism, power, and taste?
They weren't polled on the compensation package I just made up. 😆
Whatever happens, let it be by the will of the people of Greenland, beneficial and by consent.
They weren't polled on the compensation package I just made up. 😆
Whatever happens, let it be by the will of the people of Greenland, beneficial and by consent.
I see facets and implications that weigh in different directions, but is the objection about public funds, or about symbolism, power, and taste?
I see facets and implications that weigh in different directions, but is the objection about public funds, or about symbolism, power, and taste?
I’m not sure I understand the question or the frame you’re using. I know very little about Maduro, which is why I’m approaching this as someone asking for guidance rather than arguing opinions.
I’m not sure I understand the question or the frame you’re using. I know very little about Maduro, which is why I’m approaching this as someone asking for guidance rather than arguing opinions.
And we will need a new TV show -- Greenland Five One🏄♂️🌲
Always assuming Greenland is willing, of course, and that it's democratic and FULLY legal (not vibey-Trumpy-legal).
And we will need a new TV show -- Greenland Five One🏄♂️🌲
Always assuming Greenland is willing, of course, and that it's democratic and FULLY legal (not vibey-Trumpy-legal).
For me, the idea of buying territory from Native Americans the right way, for once, may be crowding out other concerns.
For me, the idea of buying territory from Native Americans the right way, for once, may be crowding out other concerns.
Treating their reaction as something to be corrected edges toward moral hegemony. I’m sure that’s not the intent, but it’s worth noticing the posture.
Treating their reaction as something to be corrected edges toward moral hegemony. I’m sure that’s not the intent, but it’s worth noticing the posture.
The fact that he's the one in change of these guys, among other things.
In a very real sense, might makes right.
This meme captures a logic that’s becoming explicit rather than hidden.
The fact that he's the one in change of these guys, among other things.
In a very real sense, might makes right.
This meme captures a logic that’s becoming explicit rather than hidden.
5. Authoritarians are fascists. (terminal category)
6. Fascists are illegitimate/outside moral concern
7. “People like that shouldn’t exist. We can’t tolerate them. History shows what must be done.”
5. Authoritarians are fascists. (terminal category)
6. Fascists are illegitimate/outside moral concern
7. “People like that shouldn’t exist. We can’t tolerate them. History shows what must be done.”
1. I dislike her work. (normative reaction)
2. She functions like a conservative. (normative framing)
3. She is a conservative activist. (judgment recast as fact)
-----let's stop here and not go on ------
1. I dislike her work. (normative reaction)
2. She functions like a conservative. (normative framing)
3. She is a conservative activist. (judgment recast as fact)
-----let's stop here and not go on ------