I told Ren…….the fireplace mural stays!😏

Yup, problem with it is the sighting optics on the vehicle are AFU after the first rounds fired, & get progressively worse every round after that!, & the thing literally comes apart (mech/damage) from the PAK 40’s recoil, it simply wasn’t designed to take the recoil!🤔a questionable combat vehicle!🙄

🤣🤣🤣😀stoner Castle?😀Ren luv’s that!, he totally approves!🤘🧛‍♂️🥰never played stoner Castle, but……I live there!😀

🤣🤣🤣😺

🤣🤣& the gaming club I ref at never does, & they have a cat!😮😺🤣

Sdkfz 251/22 3. Seems the best use of this vehicle, is the U.S. M-18 TD tactics, one ambush shot, then immediately “book”!, only, rearward, out of combat range!🤔, a good retreating/rearguard vehicle😶(for a short time)🤔, but, no real combat staying power!, anyway….🙄

Sdkfz 251/22 2. After only three rounds, there is a “mandatory” optics (gunsighting) check, if failed?, the to hit chance becomes -3, & gradually decrease’s -1 per subsequent shot, until the vehicle is taken out of combat & resighted!🙄, then come the mech/ checks, 5 mov phs’s dam/dis!🙄🤔not great!

The 251/22 is a pretty cool concept huh?, yeah but?, it has its challenges, it simply wasn’t designed to absorb the recoil of the 75 cm AT gun, it just wasn’t!, so, implementation on the battlefield has it’s issues!, of which we’re going to see on the mod’s!🤔

In this table scenario, the Germans are defending a Hungarian village against a Soviet probe (recce in force!), the Germans have a Co. of the 27th Pz. Jagr. Bttn (mot.)/w an Sdkfz 251/22, (Pak 40!) and is backstopping the dug-in forward 1st Co. of the 79th Pz. Fusilier Bttn No. 1!🤔

This thread is from the GM’s perspective, not as a player, but as the table Ref (rules modifier!), to chronicle the gameplay with the “deep dive” (realistics) rules mod’s where interesting battlefield situations take place in the world of miniature tabletop wargaming, so, let’s see what goes?😀