Reposted by Pan Satire
And finally, the assault on Section 230. This is the endgame for independent speech.
If you repeal 230, you don’t hurt Google or Meta—they have the lawyers to survive. You destroy the small forums, the independent blogs, the dissenters. You make the cost of speaking the truth too high to bear.
If you repeal 230, you don’t hurt Google or Meta—they have the lawyers to survive. You destroy the small forums, the independent blogs, the dissenters. You make the cost of speaking the truth too high to bear.
How Democrats’ Attack On Section 230 Plays Right Into Trump’s Censorial Plans
Like clockwork, lawmakers are once again rallying around the idea of eliminating Section 230. That Republicans are leading this charge is hardly surprising—repealing Section 230 is explicitly laid …
www.techdirt.com
December 14, 2025 at 9:11 PM
And finally, the assault on Section 230. This is the endgame for independent speech.
If you repeal 230, you don’t hurt Google or Meta—they have the lawyers to survive. You destroy the small forums, the independent blogs, the dissenters. You make the cost of speaking the truth too high to bear.
If you repeal 230, you don’t hurt Google or Meta—they have the lawyers to survive. You destroy the small forums, the independent blogs, the dissenters. You make the cost of speaking the truth too high to bear.
I am proud to own a piece!
January 16, 2025 at 6:26 PM
I am proud to own a piece!
learned a great phrase that applies, a long time ago.
"Appropriate technology"
Consider what you need based on it's use, not because there's something new.
"Appropriate technology"
Consider what you need based on it's use, not because there's something new.
January 14, 2025 at 6:14 PM
learned a great phrase that applies, a long time ago.
"Appropriate technology"
Consider what you need based on it's use, not because there's something new.
"Appropriate technology"
Consider what you need based on it's use, not because there's something new.