The “ article “ is wrong!
Pavement parking in Oxford is NOT illegal.
The County Council advocate it in many streets in East Oxford.
Pavement parking in Oxford is NOT illegal.
The County Council advocate it in many streets in East Oxford.
November 15, 2025 at 10:11 PM
The “ article “ is wrong!
Pavement parking in Oxford is NOT illegal.
The County Council advocate it in many streets in East Oxford.
Pavement parking in Oxford is NOT illegal.
The County Council advocate it in many streets in East Oxford.
This is completely wrong and misleading
Technically , in Oxford paving parking is not illegal
Technically , in Oxford paving parking is not illegal
November 15, 2025 at 9:48 PM
This is completely wrong and misleading
Technically , in Oxford paving parking is not illegal
Technically , in Oxford paving parking is not illegal
Have a look at Divinity Rd for pavement parking and many many other gentrified areas in East Oxford.
November 15, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Have a look at Divinity Rd for pavement parking and many many other gentrified areas in East Oxford.
So many things wrong with your post, so many
November 15, 2025 at 9:35 PM
So many things wrong with your post, so many
Why are you sending links from an unelected interest group member? Danny Yee’s fudged figures are biased and completely unreliable
Is this source what YOU rely on as “ Credible”?
Is this source what YOU rely on as “ Credible”?
July 23, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Why are you sending links from an unelected interest group member? Danny Yee’s fudged figures are biased and completely unreliable
Is this source what YOU rely on as “ Credible”?
Is this source what YOU rely on as “ Credible”?
No Ed
That’s where you Lib Dem’s FAILED.
It’s not “ credible” to your agenda. Being dismissive to ant and all alternatives because it’s not fitting the agenda is tyrannical. It’s Lib Dem’s agenda 21-30-40-42 rubbish that’s not “ credible “
That’s where you Lib Dem’s FAILED.
It’s not “ credible” to your agenda. Being dismissive to ant and all alternatives because it’s not fitting the agenda is tyrannical. It’s Lib Dem’s agenda 21-30-40-42 rubbish that’s not “ credible “
July 23, 2025 at 3:32 PM
No Ed
That’s where you Lib Dem’s FAILED.
It’s not “ credible” to your agenda. Being dismissive to ant and all alternatives because it’s not fitting the agenda is tyrannical. It’s Lib Dem’s agenda 21-30-40-42 rubbish that’s not “ credible “
That’s where you Lib Dem’s FAILED.
It’s not “ credible” to your agenda. Being dismissive to ant and all alternatives because it’s not fitting the agenda is tyrannical. It’s Lib Dem’s agenda 21-30-40-42 rubbish that’s not “ credible “
Look on IOA website who have proposed an alternative. Its not about unnecessary fines, impossible ZEZ or Orwellian controls it’s about getting Oxford moving
July 23, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Look on IOA website who have proposed an alternative. Its not about unnecessary fines, impossible ZEZ or Orwellian controls it’s about getting Oxford moving
Not true
Lib Dem’s were elected by people outside of Oxford and Plan B is their plan A repackaged
Lib Dem’s were elected by people outside of Oxford and Plan B is their plan A repackaged
July 23, 2025 at 1:35 PM
Not true
Lib Dem’s were elected by people outside of Oxford and Plan B is their plan A repackaged
Lib Dem’s were elected by people outside of Oxford and Plan B is their plan A repackaged
NO ED
Bless you
The plan they have been discussing for ages as you refer to is is NOT a Con Charge it was a Traffic Filter
2 x different schemes here if you hadn’t already worked that out. Problem is, the 2 scams are one of the same, the Con Charge is repackaged as the filters
Bless you
The plan they have been discussing for ages as you refer to is is NOT a Con Charge it was a Traffic Filter
2 x different schemes here if you hadn’t already worked that out. Problem is, the 2 scams are one of the same, the Con Charge is repackaged as the filters
July 23, 2025 at 10:55 AM
NO ED
Bless you
The plan they have been discussing for ages as you refer to is is NOT a Con Charge it was a Traffic Filter
2 x different schemes here if you hadn’t already worked that out. Problem is, the 2 scams are one of the same, the Con Charge is repackaged as the filters
Bless you
The plan they have been discussing for ages as you refer to is is NOT a Con Charge it was a Traffic Filter
2 x different schemes here if you hadn’t already worked that out. Problem is, the 2 scams are one of the same, the Con Charge is repackaged as the filters
Support is growing nearly 12,000 signatures against your dozen or so pictured here
actionstorm.org/petitions/st...
actionstorm.org/petitions/st...
actionstorm.org
July 22, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Support is growing nearly 12,000 signatures against your dozen or so pictured here
actionstorm.org/petitions/st...
actionstorm.org/petitions/st...
Danny
All of these “ Transport Leaders” as you call it are in it for the ££££££££££
Of course they are supporters. What about the business leaders/OBAG are VERY much against it
££££££££
All of these “ Transport Leaders” as you call it are in it for the ££££££££££
Of course they are supporters. What about the business leaders/OBAG are VERY much against it
££££££££
July 22, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Danny
All of these “ Transport Leaders” as you call it are in it for the ££££££££££
Of course they are supporters. What about the business leaders/OBAG are VERY much against it
££££££££
All of these “ Transport Leaders” as you call it are in it for the ££££££££££
Of course they are supporters. What about the business leaders/OBAG are VERY much against it
££££££££
Danny
For 5 business premises to become empty, 5 businesses would have needed to either fail or move out of the city
You are celebrating failure as success
For 5 business premises to become empty, 5 businesses would have needed to either fail or move out of the city
You are celebrating failure as success
July 22, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Danny
For 5 business premises to become empty, 5 businesses would have needed to either fail or move out of the city
You are celebrating failure as success
For 5 business premises to become empty, 5 businesses would have needed to either fail or move out of the city
You are celebrating failure as success
Has the county? Their plan B is their plan A repackaged
They refuse to listen to other ideas put forward as it doesn’t fit their agenda
The Lib Dem’s and greens are nothing more than puppeteers, and Labour are clueless
They refuse to listen to other ideas put forward as it doesn’t fit their agenda
The Lib Dem’s and greens are nothing more than puppeteers, and Labour are clueless
July 22, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Has the county? Their plan B is their plan A repackaged
They refuse to listen to other ideas put forward as it doesn’t fit their agenda
The Lib Dem’s and greens are nothing more than puppeteers, and Labour are clueless
They refuse to listen to other ideas put forward as it doesn’t fit their agenda
The Lib Dem’s and greens are nothing more than puppeteers, and Labour are clueless
They will. Historically County do as THEY please, ignore consultations and follow agenda 21-30-42
Unelected interest groups are steering county councillors and needs exposing
Unelected interest groups are steering county councillors and needs exposing
July 22, 2025 at 4:55 PM
They will. Historically County do as THEY please, ignore consultations and follow agenda 21-30-42
Unelected interest groups are steering county councillors and needs exposing
Unelected interest groups are steering county councillors and needs exposing
How is the truth a lie?
Unelected pressure groups should be exposed for their part in puppeteering Oxford county councillors
Shame on you
Unelected pressure groups should be exposed for their part in puppeteering Oxford county councillors
Shame on you
July 22, 2025 at 2:21 PM
How is the truth a lie?
Unelected pressure groups should be exposed for their part in puppeteering Oxford county councillors
Shame on you
Unelected pressure groups should be exposed for their part in puppeteering Oxford county councillors
Shame on you
Absolute rubbish from unelected interest group spouting misinformation again.
People cycle if they “ Choose” to not because YOU want them too
People cycle if they “ Choose” to not because YOU want them too
July 3, 2025 at 6:40 AM
Absolute rubbish from unelected interest group spouting misinformation again.
People cycle if they “ Choose” to not because YOU want them too
People cycle if they “ Choose” to not because YOU want them too
