It's certainly a tail risk that supports the no nuclear case.
No-one is realistically going to bomb a wind or solar farm...

I prefer this one, rolls off the tongue a little better:

PICNIC issue - "Problem In Chair, Not In Computer"

Hey Simon, what's unclear to me in this discussion is the storage cost of spent fuel. I assume it is a chart that goes from lower left to upper right in perpetuity, given the half-life of uranium and the ever escalating cost of labour to guard a storage facility.
Any insight on likely costs?

That's pretty sad.

How would voter participation- as great as it is - prevent 40k deaths in the most gun-loving nation?

American English is not English.