Which is why if you do read the linked Meskell paper, you should also try to read Dowson's fair and insightful critique after: www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv...
Which is why if you do read the linked Meskell paper, you should also try to read Dowson's fair and insightful critique after: www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv...
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
It is worth minding, however, that for as much as this paper gets correct, it fails to fully understand the queer theory she is using - as Thomas Dowson's 2007 critique of the paper explains in full.
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
It is worth minding, however, that for as much as this paper gets correct, it fails to fully understand the queer theory she is using - as Thomas Dowson's 2007 critique of the paper explains in full.