“I certainly think that investors are one of the last really strong bulwarks against the unconstrained development of this new technology," Mocle says.

• Engagement → board-level oversight (e.g., privacy)
• AI risks: misinfo/bias, labor impacts, energy & water use
• Vote proxies, instruct managers, add guardrails in VC/PE
• Smart policy builds trust

Visit our Events page for more information about these events, and links to register: loom.ly/zWtyuPQ

6/23 - 6/27: Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2025 (@intgovforum.bsky.social)‬
7/7 - 7/22: World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS)+20 High-Level Event 2025 (WSIS Process)
7/8: AI for Human Rights: Smarter, Faster, Fairer Monitoring (part of AI for Good Summit 2025)

‪@nataliyan.bsky.social‬ of the Berkeley AI Research Lab urges stakeholders to concentrate on the belief systems around AI, which are at least as disruptive as the products themselves.

More in ‪@techpolicypress.bsky.social‬: loom.ly/vXtGsew

Instead, employers are simply masking politically and economically motivated downsizing as "inevitable AI progress." Even worse, legislators are intentionally failing to pass laws that will protect workers if AI does come for their jobs.

More from Mohar Chatterjee in POLITICO: loom.ly/0MiD9WE

If there is a short list of issues that people are less-than-adequately educated on, this is one of them. We need more reports like this.

Google walking back its third-party cookie phase-out is a major setback (and punk out). Real privacy will never be achieved through half-measures/confusing opt-outs.

I'm surprised at you Meta! But I like it...

Thanks for putting these principles front and center. After all, all parties need to commit to good faith negotiations...

Let's arm the flies 🪰🪰 with real ears (and teach them how to take dictation).

A great lineup! 🎞️🧠

Cities and states.... don't wait around! Thanks for your continued highlighting this issue.

We have to keep fighting to find a way for AGI to serve people, not be used as a smokescreen for layoffs or weakening labor protections. You're right: we need tangible data on the impact on workers—who, where, and when.

This kind of tit-for-tat is not helpful.