oobikway
@oobikway.bsky.social
Former #Soldier, retired #Police Officer. Now teaching the next generation of criminal investigators. #Atheist. Owned by a #Cockerpoo. I enjoy #cooking - couldn’t exist without spaghetti.
Sushi.
Or to be more precise, California Roll.
Or to be more precise, California Roll.
February 2, 2025 at 7:47 PM
Sushi.
Or to be more precise, California Roll.
Or to be more precise, California Roll.
Love this soup. My kids would absolutely BURY it when they were younger.
January 20, 2025 at 11:06 AM
Love this soup. My kids would absolutely BURY it when they were younger.
I swear 99% of the population believe all barristers pick & choose clients based on some whim or other.
January 19, 2025 at 9:44 AM
I swear 99% of the population believe all barristers pick & choose clients based on some whim or other.
… and make America pay for that wall 😂
January 18, 2025 at 9:31 AM
… and make America pay for that wall 😂
Well TBF, it’s not like he’d be leading the charge is it?
What with all those bone spurs and that.
What with all those bone spurs and that.
January 18, 2025 at 9:30 AM
Well TBF, it’s not like he’d be leading the charge is it?
What with all those bone spurs and that.
What with all those bone spurs and that.
Says the man who appears to have never eaten bratwurst mit pommes und mayo or eisbein mit spetzle.
January 6, 2025 at 10:55 AM
Says the man who appears to have never eaten bratwurst mit pommes und mayo or eisbein mit spetzle.
Utd fan: ‘I’ll take a draw, moves us up to #13’
My, my … how times have changed! 🤷🏻♂️
My, my … how times have changed! 🤷🏻♂️
January 5, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Utd fan: ‘I’ll take a draw, moves us up to #13’
My, my … how times have changed! 🤷🏻♂️
My, my … how times have changed! 🤷🏻♂️
I had to look it up, but thank you. I am now looking for an opportunity to use the word liminal in everyday conversation.
January 5, 2025 at 11:26 AM
I had to look it up, but thank you. I am now looking for an opportunity to use the word liminal in everyday conversation.
Not a problem for us Brits. We’d need to know someone for about 29 years before we’d talk to them in a random, infrequently visited bar. 😂
January 5, 2025 at 11:24 AM
Not a problem for us Brits. We’d need to know someone for about 29 years before we’d talk to them in a random, infrequently visited bar. 😂
When you put it that way, it’s no different to why/how young men join gangs.
January 5, 2025 at 11:15 AM
When you put it that way, it’s no different to why/how young men join gangs.
Agreed. But I feel like the Mail is by far the worst example of this.
January 5, 2025 at 11:10 AM
Agreed. But I feel like the Mail is by far the worst example of this.
Well, he could, but anyone reading that paper would need to filter out the owner’s personal bias and obvious attempts to influence the easily fooled.
It’s not really a news organ is it - just an opinion piece designed to rabble rouse.
It’s not really a news organ is it - just an opinion piece designed to rabble rouse.
January 5, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Well, he could, but anyone reading that paper would need to filter out the owner’s personal bias and obvious attempts to influence the easily fooled.
It’s not really a news organ is it - just an opinion piece designed to rabble rouse.
It’s not really a news organ is it - just an opinion piece designed to rabble rouse.
Sorry? What?
Are you asking Paul Brand if he’s ever read the printed press?
Are you asking Paul Brand if he’s ever read the printed press?
January 4, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Sorry? What?
Are you asking Paul Brand if he’s ever read the printed press?
Are you asking Paul Brand if he’s ever read the printed press?
Agree completely. People increasingly adapt their ‘views’ based on what benefits them the most either in their careers or for monetary gain.
See Badenoche, Farage, Yaxley-Lennon, Hartley-Brewer, Hopkins, Fox, that Calvin ‘reverend’ thing, Tice, Madeley et al.
See Badenoche, Farage, Yaxley-Lennon, Hartley-Brewer, Hopkins, Fox, that Calvin ‘reverend’ thing, Tice, Madeley et al.
January 4, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Agree completely. People increasingly adapt their ‘views’ based on what benefits them the most either in their careers or for monetary gain.
See Badenoche, Farage, Yaxley-Lennon, Hartley-Brewer, Hopkins, Fox, that Calvin ‘reverend’ thing, Tice, Madeley et al.
See Badenoche, Farage, Yaxley-Lennon, Hartley-Brewer, Hopkins, Fox, that Calvin ‘reverend’ thing, Tice, Madeley et al.
It’s weapons grade irony that you will be incapable of understanding the irony of your own post 🤷🏻♂️
January 1, 2025 at 11:40 AM
It’s weapons grade irony that you will be incapable of understanding the irony of your own post 🤷🏻♂️
There’s no might ….. it did.
December 14, 2024 at 9:27 AM
There’s no might ….. it did.
Are you American by any chance?
December 14, 2024 at 9:27 AM
Are you American by any chance?
a) I’m not sure how overtime could be classed as a bonus in any way shape or form 🤷🏻♂️
b) all overtime has to be agreed before incurring it …. so yes, that would most definitely be inaccurate.
b) all overtime has to be agreed before incurring it …. so yes, that would most definitely be inaccurate.
December 11, 2024 at 8:45 PM
a) I’m not sure how overtime could be classed as a bonus in any way shape or form 🤷🏻♂️
b) all overtime has to be agreed before incurring it …. so yes, that would most definitely be inaccurate.
b) all overtime has to be agreed before incurring it …. so yes, that would most definitely be inaccurate.
😂 - Google is your friend old mate.
December 11, 2024 at 8:29 PM
😂 - Google is your friend old mate.