@oneandatwo.bsky.social
Discussing that $450M davinci painting again, Epstein details how money launderers operate with using fronts to legitimize them. For example, buying properties and associating them with a famous name to justify an increase in value.
Which famous name does he give as example? Trump.
Which famous name does he give as example? Trump.
November 17, 2025 at 6:41 AM
Discussing that $450M davinci painting again, Epstein details how money launderers operate with using fronts to legitimize them. For example, buying properties and associating them with a famous name to justify an increase in value.
Which famous name does he give as example? Trump.
Which famous name does he give as example? Trump.
Epstein’s connection to Saudis feels incredibly deep.
In 2018, he offers meetings to Bannon in yemen (via Pompeo? that feels
significant), which grant “have access unlike others.”
Bannon reply- KSA doesn’t want people asking questions brought by his presence.
Why the secrecy? What was the topic?
In 2018, he offers meetings to Bannon in yemen (via Pompeo? that feels
significant), which grant “have access unlike others.”
Bannon reply- KSA doesn’t want people asking questions brought by his presence.
Why the secrecy? What was the topic?
November 17, 2025 at 6:24 AM
Epstein’s connection to Saudis feels incredibly deep.
In 2018, he offers meetings to Bannon in yemen (via Pompeo? that feels
significant), which grant “have access unlike others.”
Bannon reply- KSA doesn’t want people asking questions brought by his presence.
Why the secrecy? What was the topic?
In 2018, he offers meetings to Bannon in yemen (via Pompeo? that feels
significant), which grant “have access unlike others.”
Bannon reply- KSA doesn’t want people asking questions brought by his presence.
Why the secrecy? What was the topic?
2 topics here in one page- a reaction with Bannon to a newly unveiled Deutsche Bank subpoena, and a meeting in Vienna.
Both topics have the tone of the insiders with insights, not outsiders idly ruminating.
Both topics have the tone of the insiders with insights, not outsiders idly ruminating.
November 17, 2025 at 6:14 AM
2 topics here in one page- a reaction with Bannon to a newly unveiled Deutsche Bank subpoena, and a meeting in Vienna.
Both topics have the tone of the insiders with insights, not outsiders idly ruminating.
Both topics have the tone of the insiders with insights, not outsiders idly ruminating.
Bannon after an 8.5 hour interview with Feds, Epstein debriefs about the scope and list of associates. (He was mentioned.) Unprompted, Epstein offers his own list of names to see if they’re on the Feds radar. Seems like co-conspirator stuff!
November 17, 2025 at 6:00 AM
Bannon after an 8.5 hour interview with Feds, Epstein debriefs about the scope and list of associates. (He was mentioned.) Unprompted, Epstein offers his own list of names to see if they’re on the Feds radar. Seems like co-conspirator stuff!
Worried that Matthew Calamari might reveal information that’d make “things get uglier”
November 17, 2025 at 5:51 AM
Worried that Matthew Calamari might reveal information that’d make “things get uglier”
Oh come on! Can't be more on the nose!
November 13, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Oh come on! Can't be more on the nose!
Steve Bannon connects Prince Andrew and Trump via Epstein.
"F and B" is a term Epstein used that seem to imply certain guidelines he followed to avoid scrutiny. Comes up only when discussing women. Not sure what it stands for - Flights and Boarding?
"F and B" is a term Epstein used that seem to imply certain guidelines he followed to avoid scrutiny. Comes up only when discussing women. Not sure what it stands for - Flights and Boarding?
November 13, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Steve Bannon connects Prince Andrew and Trump via Epstein.
"F and B" is a term Epstein used that seem to imply certain guidelines he followed to avoid scrutiny. Comes up only when discussing women. Not sure what it stands for - Flights and Boarding?
"F and B" is a term Epstein used that seem to imply certain guidelines he followed to avoid scrutiny. Comes up only when discussing women. Not sure what it stands for - Flights and Boarding?
On the 22nd, Steve Bannon asks whether they can "get rid of mnuchin", which Epstein declines.
Note - Bannon *looks up* to Epstein for political insights and framing constantly. He's not the one in charge here.
So who motivates E with a specific: "3 names to replace mnuchin" 3 days later?
Note - Bannon *looks up* to Epstein for political insights and framing constantly. He's not the one in charge here.
So who motivates E with a specific: "3 names to replace mnuchin" 3 days later?
November 13, 2025 at 8:13 PM
On the 22nd, Steve Bannon asks whether they can "get rid of mnuchin", which Epstein declines.
Note - Bannon *looks up* to Epstein for political insights and framing constantly. He's not the one in charge here.
So who motivates E with a specific: "3 names to replace mnuchin" 3 days later?
Note - Bannon *looks up* to Epstein for political insights and framing constantly. He's not the one in charge here.
So who motivates E with a specific: "3 names to replace mnuchin" 3 days later?
December 21 2018, Larry Summers thinks it's plausible that Epstein would visit Mar-a-Lago when he's in Palm Beach for the weekend.
On the 25th (Christmas Day), Epstein has a new goal: "being asked for 3 names to replace mnuchin"
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026329
On the 25th (Christmas Day), Epstein has a new goal: "being asked for 3 names to replace mnuchin"
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026329
November 13, 2025 at 8:08 PM
December 21 2018, Larry Summers thinks it's plausible that Epstein would visit Mar-a-Lago when he's in Palm Beach for the weekend.
On the 25th (Christmas Day), Epstein has a new goal: "being asked for 3 names to replace mnuchin"
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026329
On the 25th (Christmas Day), Epstein has a new goal: "being asked for 3 names to replace mnuchin"
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026329
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031686
Epstein speculates that MBS paid off Trump via Russia (that $100m mansion, contextualized) to veto ending US involvement in Yemen War
Epstein speculates that MBS paid off Trump via Russia (that $100m mansion, contextualized) to veto ending US involvement in Yemen War
November 13, 2025 at 3:27 AM
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031686
Epstein speculates that MBS paid off Trump via Russia (that $100m mansion, contextualized) to veto ending US involvement in Yemen War
Epstein speculates that MBS paid off Trump via Russia (that $100m mansion, contextualized) to veto ending US involvement in Yemen War
is this metaphor too on the nose?
November 30, 2024 at 7:21 PM
is this metaphor too on the nose?