eenps.weebly.com/eenps-psa_aw...

As it turns out, he contributed to a 1960 volume titled "Scientism and values" that seems to have quite a bit of philosophy of the social sciences in it. In case anyone knows anything about the context for this volume, please let me know - information on the Internet is scarce.

This could suggest some sort of a division of labour between STSers and philosophers of science, with the former providing pointers toward new scientific terrain to be explored and the latter offering a more in-depth scrutiny of the relevant epistemic (and non-epistemic) commitments.

What I do not appreciate about it: its relatively high tolerance for handwavy claims that may not be wrong per se but need to be backed up by more rigorous analyses in order to be substantiated.

This has been particularly evident in critical work on novel forms of biological/biosocial research.

The Hastings Center has a summer program for undergrads from underrepresented backgrounds if that's applicable www.thehastingscenter.org/publications...

I am sure you have come across this paper www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1... and related work on the Russo-Williamson thesis

Great idea. Could you add me, please? Thanks!

That sounds amazing, congrats!

Glad you received it and honoured that it will be part of your library, Anna! This thesis would not have been possible without you. And the cover colour is Cambridge Blue, although you are right that there is a bit of CB in St John's colours as well.

I'll be sure to cite this joke in my lecture on interventionism tomorrow 🙂

Congratulations to the authors on the feat they've accomplished, and I very much look forward to reading this book!

Thank you for the kind feedback, Anna!