No good reason. Maybe to have at least some form of recognition and an overview of the number of reviews I’ve done. I also hope for a future where peer reviewing earns you tokens that you need to spend in order to publish — as a way to make contributing to peer review a prerequisite for publishing.

I am not sure. The tax payer is already covering my $5,000+ APCs without much return, so I assume supporting my career isn't too much to ask. 🤓

I am totally with you. But "the right thing" depends on your goal: advancing science or advancing your career

Open science practices are not sufficiently incentivized, therefore we "do not have time" to engage in them. That is, conducting good research is not incentivized enough...