O.💗💛💙 🐳 ⁷⁼ ¹she/her ⟭⟬ᴱ ᴬᴿᴱ ᴮ⟬⟭ᶜᴷ
@odetteroulette2.bsky.social
no
Look, no.
November 21, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Look, no.
November 14, 2025 at 7:37 PM
November 14, 2025 at 7:36 PM
hahaha I did not know this was the headline that ran for that! hahahahaaha
November 14, 2025 at 6:52 PM
hahaha I did not know this was the headline that ran for that! hahahahaaha
haha true story! (pointed out to me by a friend)
November 13, 2025 at 1:15 PM
haha true story! (pointed out to me by a friend)
I'm just going to sit back and enjoy the rest of this day.
heh heh heh
Bluesky should really make a "spoilers" section for comments.
But anyway:
heh heh heh
Bluesky should really make a "spoilers" section for comments.
But anyway:
November 12, 2025 at 7:41 PM
I'm just going to sit back and enjoy the rest of this day.
heh heh heh
Bluesky should really make a "spoilers" section for comments.
But anyway:
heh heh heh
Bluesky should really make a "spoilers" section for comments.
But anyway:
Has it occurred to anyone the GOP actually are caving? SNAP back and increased, gotta release those Epstein files, admit their constituents are pressuring them on ACA. Back pay even.
Laurence is a pain but it makes sense they'd want to make a deal since they were being slaughtered in the polls.
Laurence is a pain but it makes sense they'd want to make a deal since they were being slaughtered in the polls.
November 12, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Has it occurred to anyone the GOP actually are caving? SNAP back and increased, gotta release those Epstein files, admit their constituents are pressuring them on ACA. Back pay even.
Laurence is a pain but it makes sense they'd want to make a deal since they were being slaughtered in the polls.
Laurence is a pain but it makes sense they'd want to make a deal since they were being slaughtered in the polls.
I mean, lol, "tHeY aRe AlL WhItE mEn" said the white guy, who somehow cldn't see anyone who didn't look like him.
November 11, 2025 at 3:17 AM
I mean, lol, "tHeY aRe AlL WhItE mEn" said the white guy, who somehow cldn't see anyone who didn't look like him.
I think it's ignorance and if I can find out abt these things, so can you.
November 10, 2025 at 8:53 PM
I think it's ignorance and if I can find out abt these things, so can you.
Well, they did this:
November 10, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Well, they did this:
Just a friendly reminder that none of this is accurate but white ppl can't blame themselves for their own behavior EVER.
The GOP have the House, the Senate, and the presidency. And SCOTUS. They have always been able to open the gov. They were always going to let Biden's additions expire.
The GOP have the House, the Senate, and the presidency. And SCOTUS. They have always been able to open the gov. They were always going to let Biden's additions expire.
November 10, 2025 at 6:38 PM
Just a friendly reminder that none of this is accurate but white ppl can't blame themselves for their own behavior EVER.
The GOP have the House, the Senate, and the presidency. And SCOTUS. They have always been able to open the gov. They were always going to let Biden's additions expire.
The GOP have the House, the Senate, and the presidency. And SCOTUS. They have always been able to open the gov. They were always going to let Biden's additions expire.
Any "new bits" mean it has to re-enter the House. It's not just "new bits." It's a new proposal.
I mean, even the news is insistent and while I'm normally not just listening to the news, it's pretty conclusive.
I mean, even the news is insistent and while I'm normally not just listening to the news, it's pretty conclusive.
November 10, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Any "new bits" mean it has to re-enter the House. It's not just "new bits." It's a new proposal.
I mean, even the news is insistent and while I'm normally not just listening to the news, it's pretty conclusive.
I mean, even the news is insistent and while I'm normally not just listening to the news, it's pretty conclusive.
Yes.
Oh! And this one too! Which is amusing because it's JD Vance's relative that got beaten.
Oh! And this one too! Which is amusing because it's JD Vance's relative that got beaten.
November 5, 2025 at 3:55 AM
Yes.
Oh! And this one too! Which is amusing because it's JD Vance's relative that got beaten.
Oh! And this one too! Which is amusing because it's JD Vance's relative that got beaten.
oh noes! The internet has spoken! I guess my PhD isn't real because I'm not kissing butt!! Who knew that was a requirement?
I thought that dissertation I wrote was enough.
I thought that dissertation I wrote was enough.
November 4, 2025 at 10:31 PM
oh noes! The internet has spoken! I guess my PhD isn't real because I'm not kissing butt!! Who knew that was a requirement?
I thought that dissertation I wrote was enough.
I thought that dissertation I wrote was enough.
Just as a side note, we need to stop doing this.
Even if you think "No Kings" wasn't what you wanted it to be, it was a huge turnout. Yes, it still has to happen at the polls. That's the real key. Yes, white ppl are still confused abt what they are doing.
But we can't make everything a loss.
Even if you think "No Kings" wasn't what you wanted it to be, it was a huge turnout. Yes, it still has to happen at the polls. That's the real key. Yes, white ppl are still confused abt what they are doing.
But we can't make everything a loss.
November 2, 2025 at 4:12 PM
Just as a side note, we need to stop doing this.
Even if you think "No Kings" wasn't what you wanted it to be, it was a huge turnout. Yes, it still has to happen at the polls. That's the real key. Yes, white ppl are still confused abt what they are doing.
But we can't make everything a loss.
Even if you think "No Kings" wasn't what you wanted it to be, it was a huge turnout. Yes, it still has to happen at the polls. That's the real key. Yes, white ppl are still confused abt what they are doing.
But we can't make everything a loss.
This made me laugh. Because they are doing the opposite to their users on Bluesky rn.
November 2, 2025 at 4:04 PM
This made me laugh. Because they are doing the opposite to their users on Bluesky rn.
I'd say block these two accts as well, just for the heck of it.
October 29, 2025 at 3:04 AM
I'd say block these two accts as well, just for the heck of it.
@connieschultz.bsky.social hey, you have a bot pretending to be you
October 28, 2025 at 3:33 PM
@connieschultz.bsky.social hey, you have a bot pretending to be you
New "progressive" talking point from undercover GOP. Trying to accuse Dems of what GOP are trying to cover up.
Make sure to get in their follows and block
Make sure to get in their follows and block
October 28, 2025 at 12:36 AM
New "progressive" talking point from undercover GOP. Trying to accuse Dems of what GOP are trying to cover up.
Make sure to get in their follows and block
Make sure to get in their follows and block
Yes it is. I looked it up.
And I cldn't give two shits abt the mayoral race in NY. Cuomo isn't going to win. It's not even a serious thing at this point.
If Mamdani wants to do better, he needs to apologize for supporting the UnCommitted movement because Black voters rightly feel betrayed.
And I cldn't give two shits abt the mayoral race in NY. Cuomo isn't going to win. It's not even a serious thing at this point.
If Mamdani wants to do better, he needs to apologize for supporting the UnCommitted movement because Black voters rightly feel betrayed.
October 28, 2025 at 12:22 AM
Yes it is. I looked it up.
And I cldn't give two shits abt the mayoral race in NY. Cuomo isn't going to win. It's not even a serious thing at this point.
If Mamdani wants to do better, he needs to apologize for supporting the UnCommitted movement because Black voters rightly feel betrayed.
And I cldn't give two shits abt the mayoral race in NY. Cuomo isn't going to win. It's not even a serious thing at this point.
If Mamdani wants to do better, he needs to apologize for supporting the UnCommitted movement because Black voters rightly feel betrayed.
The prob is it's illegal and wld be considered vote buying and the person who posted it made sure few cld post under it or RT it w/ a comment to clear that up. Because his intent was to have a series of posts under it denigrating the Dem party.
For not doing something they are not allowed to do.
For not doing something they are not allowed to do.
October 27, 2025 at 1:54 PM
The prob is it's illegal and wld be considered vote buying and the person who posted it made sure few cld post under it or RT it w/ a comment to clear that up. Because his intent was to have a series of posts under it denigrating the Dem party.
For not doing something they are not allowed to do.
For not doing something they are not allowed to do.