G
@oddlythere.bsky.social
A girl in a large world. Hearts and minds, let's be alike. ^^
And if the SA that was done to her is in relation to her boyfriend, which DollCreep stated that Viv told him a completely different story, ima keep it a buck, I hope she isn't crossing a line to win an argument again because that would be beyond messed up.
March 15, 2025 at 8:28 AM
And if the SA that was done to her is in relation to her boyfriend, which DollCreep stated that Viv told him a completely different story, ima keep it a buck, I hope she isn't crossing a line to win an argument again because that would be beyond messed up.
This just adds a whole ass layer of confusion that never needed to exist, and puts someone else's life on blast as something they NEVER claimed to be just to win an argument.
March 15, 2025 at 8:24 AM
This just adds a whole ass layer of confusion that never needed to exist, and puts someone else's life on blast as something they NEVER claimed to be just to win an argument.
Just saw this. Cool that she said this, it only makes what she did worse because if she's fine with saying this publicly, why on earth did she straight up LIE about Raph?
March 15, 2025 at 8:23 AM
Just saw this. Cool that she said this, it only makes what she did worse because if she's fine with saying this publicly, why on earth did she straight up LIE about Raph?
"i feel like you're only saying it's bad bc you and some others feel uncomfortable-" it's bad for the reason I just gave you.
February 11, 2025 at 3:36 PM
"i feel like you're only saying it's bad bc you and some others feel uncomfortable-" it's bad for the reason I just gave you.
"so? the show still takes it seriously,"
Cool, when the creator can make a cum joke about a song meant to tackle SA "seriously" it goes to show the mindset they have on the song altogether and how "serious" it truly is.
Cool, when the creator can make a cum joke about a song meant to tackle SA "seriously" it goes to show the mindset they have on the song altogether and how "serious" it truly is.
February 11, 2025 at 3:34 PM
"so? the show still takes it seriously,"
Cool, when the creator can make a cum joke about a song meant to tackle SA "seriously" it goes to show the mindset they have on the song altogether and how "serious" it truly is.
Cool, when the creator can make a cum joke about a song meant to tackle SA "seriously" it goes to show the mindset they have on the song altogether and how "serious" it truly is.
It literally wasn't an inappropriate question. Raph quite literally said they aren't a victim and I asked why Viv lied. Pay attention.
February 11, 2025 at 3:33 PM
It literally wasn't an inappropriate question. Raph quite literally said they aren't a victim and I asked why Viv lied. Pay attention.
"episode 4 is still very much serious and doesn't "fetishize"-" it quite literally does. It references Raph's fetish comic, even hyperfocuses on Angel's abuse in ways that are unnecessary and does it through an MV and the creator made jokes about it before release.
February 11, 2025 at 3:32 PM
"episode 4 is still very much serious and doesn't "fetishize"-" it quite literally does. It references Raph's fetish comic, even hyperfocuses on Angel's abuse in ways that are unnecessary and does it through an MV and the creator made jokes about it before release.
"it's highly inappropriate to be talking like someone's sexuality is some hot drama in the fandom"
Not why it was brought up. It was brought up cause they get off to something like rape while not being a victim and use a character who's experiences are meant to be taken seriously for fetish art.
Not why it was brought up. It was brought up cause they get off to something like rape while not being a victim and use a character who's experiences are meant to be taken seriously for fetish art.
February 11, 2025 at 10:47 AM
"it's highly inappropriate to be talking like someone's sexuality is some hot drama in the fandom"
Not why it was brought up. It was brought up cause they get off to something like rape while not being a victim and use a character who's experiences are meant to be taken seriously for fetish art.
Not why it was brought up. It was brought up cause they get off to something like rape while not being a victim and use a character who's experiences are meant to be taken seriously for fetish art.
"euther she didn't know and was guessing or didn't want to argue about her employees personal stuff,"
So....don't announce it as fact then. Very simple.
So....don't announce it as fact then. Very simple.
February 11, 2025 at 10:46 AM
"euther she didn't know and was guessing or didn't want to argue about her employees personal stuff,"
So....don't announce it as fact then. Very simple.
So....don't announce it as fact then. Very simple.
"and why are fetishes so bad?"
Reread my response. The answer is right there.
Reread my response. The answer is right there.
February 11, 2025 at 10:46 AM
"and why are fetishes so bad?"
Reread my response. The answer is right there.
Reread my response. The answer is right there.
Oh, and the fact Viv straight up lied about Raph being a victim.
February 11, 2025 at 10:07 AM
Oh, and the fact Viv straight up lied about Raph being a victim.
"I'm also a victim and I don't think someone needs a victim status to have a kink"
Cool, this not only is an opinion belonging to you, but greatly ignores the main gripe which is a topic meant to be taken seriously being treated as fetish material. That is the point of contention here.
Cool, this not only is an opinion belonging to you, but greatly ignores the main gripe which is a topic meant to be taken seriously being treated as fetish material. That is the point of contention here.
February 11, 2025 at 10:05 AM
"I'm also a victim and I don't think someone needs a victim status to have a kink"
Cool, this not only is an opinion belonging to you, but greatly ignores the main gripe which is a topic meant to be taken seriously being treated as fetish material. That is the point of contention here.
Cool, this not only is an opinion belonging to you, but greatly ignores the main gripe which is a topic meant to be taken seriously being treated as fetish material. That is the point of contention here.
"Idk what Raph has said behind closed doors"
You are creating a hypothetical at this point. Raph themselves said THEY AREN'T an SA Victim....twice. idk how much more proof you need at this point. Their trauma does not automatically mean it is SA related.
You are creating a hypothetical at this point. Raph themselves said THEY AREN'T an SA Victim....twice. idk how much more proof you need at this point. Their trauma does not automatically mean it is SA related.
February 10, 2025 at 8:07 AM
"Idk what Raph has said behind closed doors"
You are creating a hypothetical at this point. Raph themselves said THEY AREN'T an SA Victim....twice. idk how much more proof you need at this point. Their trauma does not automatically mean it is SA related.
You are creating a hypothetical at this point. Raph themselves said THEY AREN'T an SA Victim....twice. idk how much more proof you need at this point. Their trauma does not automatically mean it is SA related.
I am sorry you went through that, but Raph EXPLICITLY STATED they AREN'T an SA victim. You are giving a hypothetical when it isn't needed nor applies. Again, sorry you had to go through that.
February 10, 2025 at 8:05 AM
I am sorry you went through that, but Raph EXPLICITLY STATED they AREN'T an SA victim. You are giving a hypothetical when it isn't needed nor applies. Again, sorry you had to go through that.
Again....proof. send the message I sent and the like as PROOF.
February 10, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Again....proof. send the message I sent and the like as PROOF.
"Like I said idk the extent of Raph’s"
You don't. The lie was that they're an SA Victim. They're not.
You don't. The lie was that they're an SA Victim. They're not.
February 10, 2025 at 8:02 AM
"Like I said idk the extent of Raph’s"
You don't. The lie was that they're an SA Victim. They're not.
You don't. The lie was that they're an SA Victim. They're not.
"Don’t get condescending with me" me telling you to read after you have showcased that you DIDN'T read it, is not condescension. It's called being blunt cause idk how you you miss them saying they're not an SA victim TWICE.
February 10, 2025 at 8:01 AM
"Don’t get condescending with me" me telling you to read after you have showcased that you DIDN'T read it, is not condescension. It's called being blunt cause idk how you you miss them saying they're not an SA victim TWICE.
"“repression and control?”"
That's not SA and they state in the second screenshot along with the first that it isn't SA, please read before commenting.
That's not SA and they state in the second screenshot along with the first that it isn't SA, please read before commenting.
February 10, 2025 at 7:58 AM
"“repression and control?”"
That's not SA and they state in the second screenshot along with the first that it isn't SA, please read before commenting.
That's not SA and they state in the second screenshot along with the first that it isn't SA, please read before commenting.
"Tbh idk"
So you have been arguing this entire time without even fact-checking anything....
So you have been arguing this entire time without even fact-checking anything....
February 10, 2025 at 7:56 AM
"Tbh idk"
So you have been arguing this entire time without even fact-checking anything....
So you have been arguing this entire time without even fact-checking anything....
"Bully survivors"
Proof?
Proof?
February 10, 2025 at 7:55 AM
"Bully survivors"
Proof?
Proof?
K point to where I said I wanted to know her story, I wanted to see something.
February 10, 2025 at 7:55 AM
K point to where I said I wanted to know her story, I wanted to see something.
"an apology" and it's me saying she needs to correct her wrongs because it has legitimately misled people into believing Raph was something they're not. Are you saying what she did is CORRECT?
February 10, 2025 at 7:53 AM
"an apology" and it's me saying she needs to correct her wrongs because it has legitimately misled people into believing Raph was something they're not. Are you saying what she did is CORRECT?
"Not even defending her" stop saying you aren't. You quite literally are and have more than once. You have literally stated that mean calling her out is something of bad faith. That is directly defending her. If you are gonna get involved be straight up.
February 10, 2025 at 7:50 AM
"Not even defending her" stop saying you aren't. You quite literally are and have more than once. You have literally stated that mean calling her out is something of bad faith. That is directly defending her. If you are gonna get involved be straight up.
Cool, asking why she straight up lied to several people's faces to win an argument is valid and I shouldn't be barred from asking all cause she wants to play dumb and act like she didn't just state something about SOMEONE ELSE'S experiences as a gotcha. You sure you're not defending her, buddy.💀
February 10, 2025 at 7:49 AM
Cool, asking why she straight up lied to several people's faces to win an argument is valid and I shouldn't be barred from asking all cause she wants to play dumb and act like she didn't just state something about SOMEONE ELSE'S experiences as a gotcha. You sure you're not defending her, buddy.💀