Lol similar here! Meanwhile most of it is necessary back ups to cover scenarios of not having my access needs met 😆

Yea context seems to be lost sometimes or people bring their own assumptions into it.

Right?!! It barely picks up my inflections 😭

😆 Definitely for every large corporation I encounter! Then use their virtual debt to pay for free lessons to smaller businesses, disabled folks, and allies for better practices 101 😜

And thank you! It actually sparked a lot in how I want to move with this and it's been super helpful actually. If and when the project picks up I hope to absorb all of this and continue to check and reflect as I go.

At first I fixated on the lack of transparency part but that was the information shared so I understand and see the care you put into it! ❤️ In fact "friction" in absorbing the critique is imperative to my work. So I appreciate that AND the article for always putting in the care.

[cont from fatigue break]

I intend to share the process/credits as it evolves (with permissions). The copyright meant for the swirl itself I realize wasn't made clear.

The critique of feedback methods was enlightening. If you have the space I'd love to chat/learn better practices in my practice.

I really loved this article and the work behind it. The Disability Symbol is on pause but you've given me much to think about how/if to proceed (and discuss with my partner). Especially the way in which we gather feedback.

Bet it will send a shock to people who try and buy an android after it's implanted 👀 /satire (or dystopian humour)

Thank you! Going to be putting our collab up too 😉