What they really want is this!

A kinder, gentler politics over here on BlueSky. So enjoyable

It did. Read the Hansard debate before the GRA 2004 was enacted. Exactly what came to pass (but then worse) came to pass, valid concerns over circular definitions were raised, clashes of rights with other groups were described. All ignored. Read it, and revise your article accordingly.

He’s a man. He was a man at the moment he was conceived and will be a man for the rest of his life, if he has his penis removed (which he has not yet done), takes hormones or wears different clothes. He is a man in every cell of his body. You and he may hold a religious belief he is not, but he is.

Man uses women’s dressing room and is told he is a man and shouldn’t be there. Man claims bullying. Typical male behaviour. Fife will lose this case as all Respondents have lost these claims by women so far. At some stage policy will change, perhaps after Stonewall did this.

I wonder why people with bios like this are more likely to have kids who think they’re trans. It’s a real chin-scratcher

You’ve made your ridiculous position perfectly clear.

Isn’t BlueSky brilliant? We can come here and have a respectful, polite and frank debate. So refreshing.

Oh…

Do you mean hate speech like this?