www.numbershapes.com/interactives...
www.numbershapes.com/interactives...
www.numbershapes.com/interactives...
And Vote for it here:
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
www.numbershapes.com/interactives...
And Vote for it here:
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
“When it’s half as big, you need twice as many.”
It was a really good entry point because we could then do things like “if a bucket is half full, you need twice as many” etc.
Boy do I miss those conversations.
“When it’s half as big, you need twice as many.”
It was a really good entry point because we could then do things like “if a bucket is half full, you need twice as many” etc.
Boy do I miss those conversations.
I can’t ever see myself pointing to a symbol or expression and saying “is this a number?”.
I’d rather ask,
“What idea is this symbol designed to communicate? Why was it designed that way?”
And
“What is being communicated in this context? Is it ambiguous or well defined”
I can’t ever see myself pointing to a symbol or expression and saying “is this a number?”.
I’d rather ask,
“What idea is this symbol designed to communicate? Why was it designed that way?”
And
“What is being communicated in this context? Is it ambiguous or well defined”