Null
@nullify.bsky.social
“Most believe that a satisfactory future requires a return to an idealized past, a past which never in fact existed” -Frank Herbert
Normal people can distinguish between the content and the ads. This is such a non issue, quit trying to make it one.
June 16, 2023 at 9:15 PM
Normal people can distinguish between the content and the ads. This is such a non issue, quit trying to make it one.
This is why you *always*, ALWAYS!, wrap your sandwiches yo.. even if you going to immediately eat it. Legitimately makes the sandwich better
June 16, 2023 at 9:14 PM
This is why you *always*, ALWAYS!, wrap your sandwiches yo.. even if you going to immediately eat it. Legitimately makes the sandwich better
Seems like a cool guy 🤨 what you mean?
May 20, 2023 at 12:25 AM
Seems like a cool guy 🤨 what you mean?
And the Right to bare arms is not “outdated”.. there will always be bad people out there and people deserve, and have, the right to protect themselves.
Just think of it as body autonomy: you have to right to touch me.
Just think of it as body autonomy: you have to right to touch me.
May 8, 2023 at 1:38 AM
And the Right to bare arms is not “outdated”.. there will always be bad people out there and people deserve, and have, the right to protect themselves.
Just think of it as body autonomy: you have to right to touch me.
Just think of it as body autonomy: you have to right to touch me.
The reaction to the concept of “common sense” laws are the same, hence: point.
But y’all want to restrict one based on the SLIM POSSIBILITY someone will kill somebody else, but want no restrictions on the other one that is literally, actively killing someone. Makes zero sense, js.
But y’all want to restrict one based on the SLIM POSSIBILITY someone will kill somebody else, but want no restrictions on the other one that is literally, actively killing someone. Makes zero sense, js.
May 8, 2023 at 1:35 AM
The reaction to the concept of “common sense” laws are the same, hence: point.
But y’all want to restrict one based on the SLIM POSSIBILITY someone will kill somebody else, but want no restrictions on the other one that is literally, actively killing someone. Makes zero sense, js.
But y’all want to restrict one based on the SLIM POSSIBILITY someone will kill somebody else, but want no restrictions on the other one that is literally, actively killing someone. Makes zero sense, js.
It’s quite easy to understand: common sense abortion laws.
Your reaction to that concept is how they react to gun control. There’s a “slippery slope” mentality
Your reaction to that concept is how they react to gun control. There’s a “slippery slope” mentality
May 7, 2023 at 11:36 PM
It’s quite easy to understand: common sense abortion laws.
Your reaction to that concept is how they react to gun control. There’s a “slippery slope” mentality
Your reaction to that concept is how they react to gun control. There’s a “slippery slope” mentality