This site actually hides the posts from other people as well after you block someone.

And how does that reinforce that nudity isn't sexual if we still treat it as something that needs to be censored in certain cases.

Either it's sexual/needs to be censored, or it isn't. Exceptions make the whole concept fall apart, which is why I feel they aren't true believers in the idea.

Yeah. I have a personal belief that if you make exceptions where nudity has to be censored, you're sexualizing it, and hurting the idea of it being non-sexual.

If it's truly non-sexual (which I believe), there should be no objections to it for EVERYONE.

Don't naturist children deserve media too? How are we going to show nudity as non-sexual if we keep making these exceptions where it's taboo? I feel that thinking it's problematic in certain cases, like that sexualizes it. If nudity is to be considered non-sexual, it has to be universal.

I've met multiple parents who appreciate it, and people who have told me they felt isolated being a naturist kid.

I would get it if it was based on actual kids, because there's parents who don't want ANY pictures of THEIR kids online, but why would they be opposed to media?

I just don't understand why they'd be opposed to depictions of these characters who aren't based on real people that's trying to help normalize family naturism.

I would think naturist parents would appreciate media that depicts it as a wholesome thing.

These are very wholesome!

I'd love to help out with them!

If you call yourself a "naturist", but you're going to get offended by family naturism, you aren't a naturist. You're a costumeless cosplayer. You wear the label, but don't understand it.

Sorry for the strong language, but what is that about?! I would NEVER expect this from so-called "naturists". This community shouldn't be a place for ignorance on the desexualization of nudity.

I can do solo drawings as well as group/family drawings!