I am not a Russian bot, and I challenge you to prove otherwise
@notarussianbot.bsky.social
Advocate for human rights; she/her
Well, that was Kirk being judged for the content of his character. This customer is being judged for the color of their skin. That was MLK’s dream… right?
December 13, 2025 at 1:10 PM
Well, that was Kirk being judged for the content of his character. This customer is being judged for the color of their skin. That was MLK’s dream… right?
These 8 didn’t go rogue. Schumer/Dems strategically selected 8 senators who were retiring/not up for reelection to be the rotating villians.
November 10, 2025 at 2:13 PM
These 8 didn’t go rogue. Schumer/Dems strategically selected 8 senators who were retiring/not up for reelection to be the rotating villians.
The Demos who are meaninglessly voting against the GOP (who are up for reelection) are provided cover. Meanwhile the Dems who voted w/ Republicans are safe bc Americans will forget about their actions by the time they are up for reelection. Democrats have been running this scam for decades.
November 10, 2025 at 2:02 PM
The Demos who are meaninglessly voting against the GOP (who are up for reelection) are provided cover. Meanwhile the Dems who voted w/ Republicans are safe bc Americans will forget about their actions by the time they are up for reelection. Democrats have been running this scam for decades.
No. This was a Democrat strategy, not just the act of a few senators. It’s called rotating villains. The Democrats who sided with Republicans to sell out Americans were strategically selected bc they either aren’t up for reelection cycle next year or are retiring.
November 10, 2025 at 1:55 PM
No. This was a Democrat strategy, not just the act of a few senators. It’s called rotating villains. The Democrats who sided with Republicans to sell out Americans were strategically selected bc they either aren’t up for reelection cycle next year or are retiring.
The Dems who voted w/the GOP aren’t up for reelection next cycle. This was a strategic sellout to allow “safe” Dems to throw Americans under the bus while protecting the Dems whose seats are up for grabs. Schumer & Dem leadership are working to protect their positions at the expense of the country.
November 10, 2025 at 3:21 AM
The Dems who voted w/the GOP aren’t up for reelection next cycle. This was a strategic sellout to allow “safe” Dems to throw Americans under the bus while protecting the Dems whose seats are up for grabs. Schumer & Dem leadership are working to protect their positions at the expense of the country.
dismantle democracy then this country is cooked.
You guys had more opposition to Mamdani, including aligning yourself with sexual predator, Andrew Cuomo, than you do to the GOP.
What a colossal disappointment Democratic leadership is 🤦♀️
You guys had more opposition to Mamdani, including aligning yourself with sexual predator, Andrew Cuomo, than you do to the GOP.
What a colossal disappointment Democratic leadership is 🤦♀️
November 10, 2025 at 3:12 AM
dismantle democracy then this country is cooked.
You guys had more opposition to Mamdani, including aligning yourself with sexual predator, Andrew Cuomo, than you do to the GOP.
What a colossal disappointment Democratic leadership is 🤦♀️
You guys had more opposition to Mamdani, including aligning yourself with sexual predator, Andrew Cuomo, than you do to the GOP.
What a colossal disappointment Democratic leadership is 🤦♀️
What? You guys are literally giving in for a promise for the GOP that they will hold a vote. Their promises are no good, and we know how they will vote.
If this is how Democrats are responding to a party that has spent decades laying the foundation from local to state to federal levels to
If this is how Democrats are responding to a party that has spent decades laying the foundation from local to state to federal levels to
November 10, 2025 at 3:07 AM
What? You guys are literally giving in for a promise for the GOP that they will hold a vote. Their promises are no good, and we know how they will vote.
If this is how Democrats are responding to a party that has spent decades laying the foundation from local to state to federal levels to
If this is how Democrats are responding to a party that has spent decades laying the foundation from local to state to federal levels to
It doesn’t. But SCOTUS has said that federal law enforcement has a lot of latitude when it comes to enforcing the law. (To be clear, I am not defending the feds. Fuck them and ACAB. I’m just explaining the law.)
October 4, 2025 at 1:51 AM
It doesn’t. But SCOTUS has said that federal law enforcement has a lot of latitude when it comes to enforcing the law. (To be clear, I am not defending the feds. Fuck them and ACAB. I’m just explaining the law.)
If their crimes are committed while enforcing the law, unfortunately, they are.
October 4, 2025 at 1:49 AM
If their crimes are committed while enforcing the law, unfortunately, they are.
Unfortunately, the person above is correct. When federal officers are operating within the scope of their federal authority, they are immune from state prosecution.
October 3, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Unfortunately, the person above is correct. When federal officers are operating within the scope of their federal authority, they are immune from state prosecution.
Impossible. Kavanaugh assured us that it was ok to racially profile people because citizens and legal residents would only be briefly detained. 🙄🙄🙄
October 3, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Impossible. Kavanaugh assured us that it was ok to racially profile people because citizens and legal residents would only be briefly detained. 🙄🙄🙄