You quote number 26 but not number 25 which is literally in GREEN?
November 30, 2025 at 11:22 PM
You quote number 26 but not number 25 which is literally in GREEN?
Why did you hide the whole quote?
November 30, 2025 at 11:09 PM
Why did you hide the whole quote?
The “funniest” part for me was when the Embassy of Israel in Germany explained they try to prevent Omri Boehm from speaking at the ceremony of the liberation of Buchenwald because they “oppose a ‘progressive’ agenda that seeks to create a Holocaust remembrance without Jews”.
April 7, 2025 at 6:06 AM
The “funniest” part for me was when the Embassy of Israel in Germany explained they try to prevent Omri Boehm from speaking at the ceremony of the liberation of Buchenwald because they “oppose a ‘progressive’ agenda that seeks to create a Holocaust remembrance without Jews”.
(English article from a German blog that describes itself as queer feminist, radical leftist, and pro-Israel:)
April 6, 2025 at 5:06 PM
(English article from a German blog that describes itself as queer feminist, radical leftist, and pro-Israel:)
Still on the Bundestag's website, you can read that Staatsräson isn't in the Constitution or any law and that it is not a legal term. There is no obligation to act accordingly to the idea of Staatsräson, and no legal consequence if you don't.
April 6, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Still on the Bundestag's website, you can read that Staatsräson isn't in the Constitution or any law and that it is not a legal term. There is no obligation to act accordingly to the idea of Staatsräson, and no legal consequence if you don't.
- "To act accordingly to Staats means [...] to prioritize state interests over all other legal goods and interests, and if necessary to break the legal rder and he general rules of morality to enfirce them." (Helmut Quaritsch)
April 6, 2025 at 4:16 PM
- "To act accordingly to Staats means [...] to prioritize state interests over all other legal goods and interests, and if necessary to break the legal rder and he general rules of morality to enfirce them." (Helmut Quaritsch)
The definitions on the website of the Bundestag (Germany's Parliament):
- "The principle, according to which the highest standard of state action is the preservation and increase of the state's benefit, even at the expense of violatinf morality and legal regulations."
- "The principle, according to which the highest standard of state action is the preservation and increase of the state's benefit, even at the expense of violatinf morality and legal regulations."
April 6, 2025 at 4:16 PM
The definitions on the website of the Bundestag (Germany's Parliament):
- "The principle, according to which the highest standard of state action is the preservation and increase of the state's benefit, even at the expense of violatinf morality and legal regulations."
- "The principle, according to which the highest standard of state action is the preservation and increase of the state's benefit, even at the expense of violatinf morality and legal regulations."
(1/2) "S[taatsräson] is a principle that places the interests of the state above all other (particular or individual) interests.
According to this absolutist or authoritarian principle, the preservation of power, unity, and survival of the state is a value in itself and ultimately justifies ...
According to this absolutist or authoritarian principle, the preservation of power, unity, and survival of the state is a value in itself and ultimately justifies ...
April 6, 2025 at 4:09 PM
(1/2) "S[taatsräson] is a principle that places the interests of the state above all other (particular or individual) interests.
According to this absolutist or authoritarian principle, the preservation of power, unity, and survival of the state is a value in itself and ultimately justifies ...
According to this absolutist or authoritarian principle, the preservation of power, unity, and survival of the state is a value in itself and ultimately justifies ...
demands of terrorists) are more important than the interests of individuals. also, bpb states that there is no Staatsräson logic in democratic states.
April 6, 2025 at 4:05 PM
demands of terrorists) are more important than the interests of individuals. also, bpb states that there is no Staatsräson logic in democratic states.
To understand German Zionism, you need to know the concept of Staatsräson. It explains why Germany disregards international law when it comes to Israel and the ICC's decision to issue a warrant for Netanyahu, despite Germans having the reputation of stricly adhere to rules and laws.
April 6, 2025 at 4:05 PM
To understand German Zionism, you need to know the concept of Staatsräson. It explains why Germany disregards international law when it comes to Israel and the ICC's decision to issue a warrant for Netanyahu, despite Germans having the reputation of stricly adhere to rules and laws.
That’s funny because at no point they explain why — but I also realized that I’m only using this account to READ what is happening on Twitter.
April 3, 2025 at 4:16 PM
That’s funny because at no point they explain why — but I also realized that I’m only using this account to READ what is happening on Twitter.
