Wasn't Trump going to get rid of the ATF?

I don't think it would make a difference. See: police and prosecutors who are given immunity (by the judiciary) before (meritorious) claims even get to discovery or disclosure.

Qualified Immunity has not been reasonably constitutional, like ever. It took almost 100 years for Congress to feel it necessary to codify it in law. Took even longer to explicitly give women equal protection. A reasonable interpretation of the original text was sufficient throughout our history.

If we're going that route, the judiciary should have their own investigative agencies with the authority to perform arrets, too.

Well. Then because Trump hates judges. Either way..

You know, the Trump DOJ may be interested in hearing about the issues we have been having with the judiciary, particularly when it comes to judges respecting the Constitutional rights of the people appearing in court, especially self represented laypeople.

Except, of course, for root certificate auth, which can be pushed to your phone without your knowledge by your carrier and/or apple.

Agreed. Bring charges. Seditious conspiracy. I got a few more, with supporting evidence.. Too bad you're not actually into government accountability.

I'm down, lmk.

Judicial precedent: the judicial branch (unconstitutionally) creating law

Hope they bring her in wearing shackles and an orange jumpsuit. Obstruction of justice as an AG is a worse look though.

So.. according to the logic, if the law has been passed by Congress, and it has not been asserted to be unconstitutional, then it is clearly established law. The language of the law says so, which clearly established the law. Got it.

The Constitution is literally our government's founding document. It enshrines the rights of all people with its borders, and that those rights shall not be infringed upon, including by the government. It is the foundation for all laws enacted by a government sworn to uphold and protect our rights.

I'd prefer 12 laypeople to 12 cops, 12 prosecutors, or 12 judges. Especially when considering a plain meaning.

You mean he should have them arrest the ones who dropped Trump's prosecution due to internal policy?

Maybe just tell it only while sitting down, notwithstanding.

If the judiciary could reasonably be relied upon to fairly and impartially administer justice, I would agree. That's why the Founders trial by jury requirement.

There needs to be a better mechanism for dealing with unconstitutional statutes than judges saying "oh yeah, that law has already been determined to be unconstitutional." It needs to be fast track repealed by the legislature that enacted it, or maybe a judicial veto?