LightNews LightNews
noseki.bsky.social
@noseki.bsky.social
170 followers 14 following 1.2K posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted
scabbyhabby.bsky.social
November 16, 2025 at 3:17 PM
noseki.bsky.social
November 16, 2025 at 9:51 AM
Reposted
steviegeee.bsky.social
#RepublicansLieAboutEVERYTHING🤥
#RepublicansAreHypocrites🤥
#RepublicansAreCorrupt🕵️
#RepublicansCanNOTGovern❌
#RepublicansAreDestroyingUSA☄️
#RepublicansAreRacists🫥
#RepublicansAreHypocrites🤥
#EndTheRepublicanClownShow⁦‪🤡
November 15, 2025 at 6:24 PM
noseki.bsky.social
A 'cuestão' central é que o Bozo entregou a chave do cofre para a rataria do Centrão, e eles gostaram e se acostumaram.

Pegar de volta vai ser phoooooda...
Bolsonaro pode ser o autor do maior esquema de corrupção da história do Brasil
Em 5 de outubro de 2022, o presidente Bolsonaro desviou mais R$ 10,5 bilhões de verbas que seriam destinadas à saúde, ciência e educação
diplomatique.org.br
November 15, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Reposted
crazycanloon.bsky.social
November 15, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Reposted
gregsargent.bsky.social
New Epstein emails "seem to show Trump understood who Epstein was, how he and Maxwell were acting, and the kinds of crimes they were committing. He was adjacent to, if not involved in, those crimes."

On the pod Nicole Hemmer is brilliant on bigger Epstein-MAGA story:
newrepublic.com/article/2031...
Trump Press Sec’s Epstein Spin Implodes as New Info Rattles Him Deeply
As Karoline Leavitt struggles to explain away Trump’s growing panic over new Jeffrey Epstein revelations, a sharp observer of the right explains why MAGA is cracking up over the scandal—and what to ex...
newrepublic.com
November 13, 2025 at 3:42 PM
noseki.bsky.social
November 14, 2025 at 10:23 AM
Reposted
carapanarana.bsky.social
Epstein chama Bolsonaro de "my guy".
bsoyuz.com vou te estalar o coco @bsoyuz.com · 3d
Ainda tem a outra mensagem onde o Epstein pede pro Chomsky dizer pro Lula que o Jair vai levar no primeiro turno.
November 13, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Reposted
marcianobrito.bsky.social
A PF apreendeu 400 mil com um BOLSONARISTA secretário do Eduardo Leite!! Ele ROUBOU dinheiro que o Lula enviou pras vítimas das enchentes enquanto fazia post no Instagram dizendo que o Lula não mandou dinheiro!!
November 13, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Reposted
dersuzzalla.bsky.social
A facção que comanda o centrão que vai fazer o projeto antifacção.. vai dar super certo
November 13, 2025 at 10:17 AM
Reposted
hansonmark.bsky.social
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing:

a 🧵 1/n

Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below. 1. The four-fold drain 1.1 Money Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis, which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024 alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher (Elsevier) always over 37%. Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor & Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3 billion in that year. A figure detailing the drain on researcher time. 1. The four-fold drain 1.2 Time The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce, with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure 1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs, grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time. The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many review demands. Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in ‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier, local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision. A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below: 1. The four-fold drain 1.1 Money Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis, which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024 alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher (Elsevier) always over 37%. Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor & Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3 billion in that year. The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
November 11, 2025 at 11:52 AM
Reposted
albertopt.bsky.social
Tarcísio e Derrite estão destruindo São Paulo.
November 11, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Reposted
brasil.gov.br
🚨 ATENÇÃO! 🚨

O Governo do Brasil enviou o Projeto de Lei Antifacção para endurecer o combate ao crime organizado. Mas os relatórios apresentados na Câmara dos Deputados insistem em mudanças que limitam a atuação da Polícia Federal.

👇
November 13, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Reposted
brasil.gov.br
O Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública acompanha com preocupação a sequência de relatórios apresentados à Câmara dos Deputados pelo relator do Substitutivo ao Projeto de Lei 5.582 que trata do combate às facções criminosas.

Confira a nota >> www.instagram.com/p/DQ-QmMeER8j
November 12, 2025 at 10:21 PM
Reposted
revistaforum.com.br
Assessor de Tarcísio pego pela PF com R$ 2,1 milhões em dinheiro: Isso explicaria o PL de Derrite?

Ação da PF ocorre na mesma semana em que secretário de Segurança de SP tentou impor à força trava legal que impediria federais de investigarem nos estados
Assessor de Tarcísio pego pela PF com R$ 2,1 milhões em dinheiro: Isso explicaria o PL de Derrite?
Ação da PF ocorre na mesma semana em que secretário de Segurança de SP tentou impor à força trava legal que impediria federais de investigarem nos estados
revistaforum.com.br
November 12, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Reposted
edinei06.bsky.social
Excelente dia companheir@s!
Vamos que vamos porque a luta é árdua.
A pergunta que não quer calar: por que tem governadores querendo afastar a polícia federal das investigações das organizações criminosas? PL DO CRIME ORGANIZADO!!
November 11, 2025 at 9:59 AM
Reposted
llfarm.bsky.social
If child sexual abuse and an Epstein link can turn a prince into a former prince, it can turn a president into a former president. Release the Epstein files. @crustnews
November 11, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Reposted
brasil.gov.br
O diretor-geral da Polícia Federal, Andrei Rodrigues, explicou em entrevista que o relatório apresentado ontem na Câmara limita a atuação da PF no combate ao crime organizado. O Governo do Brasil enviou o PL Antifacção ao Congresso e não aceita que o projeto seja distorcido para enfraquecer a PF.
November 11, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Reposted
crisvector.com
Explorers (1985)
victorpersico.bsky.social Victor @victorpersico.bsky.social · 5d
Vcs tem algum filme assim??
November 12, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Reposted
crisvector.com
Não tem a menor condição manter o Derrite ma relatoria desse projeto antifacção. Quem confia?
eduardosterzi.bsky.social eduardosterzi.bsky.social @eduardosterzi.bsky.social · 5d
As coisas têm de ser tratadas nos termos devidos. Tarcísio enviou Derrite de volta para o Congresso para sabotar a lei antifacções, blindando os cúmplices de ambos com relação a investigações pela Polícia Federal. Deveriam ser investigados por essa tentativa de favorecer o crime organizado.
November 12, 2025 at 12:41 AM
noseki.bsky.social
O jagunço Derrite se licencia do cargo de secretário do Chokito e sai correndo para reassumir a vaga de d-putado em Brasília... Porque?
November 12, 2025 at 10:34 AM
Reposted
brasil.gov.br
Nota oficial da Receita Federal em defesa da atuação da Polícia Federal no combate ao crime organizado. Leia na íntegra: www.gov.br/receitafederal/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2025/novembro/nota-a-imprensa
November 11, 2025 at 1:33 AM
noseki.bsky.social
Porque o jagunço Derrite (17 mortes) correu para Brasília ser o "relator" do projeto anti-facção do Governo Federal...
Escanteada em relatório de Derrite, PF investiga corrupção na polícia de SP
Policiais civis e militares já foram alvo de apurações recentes da PF que mostraram corrupção, lavagem de dinheiro e envolvimento com o PCC
www.metropoles.com
November 11, 2025 at 9:19 AM
noseki.bsky.social
M.A.G.A.....
November 10, 2025 at 10:00 PM
Reposted
brasil.gov.br
🚨ATENÇÃO!🚨

⚠️ O Governo do Brasil enviou ao Congresso o Projeto de Lei Antifacção para endurecer o combate ao crime organizado no Brasil. Com o relatório apresentado hoje na Câmara dos Deputados, no entanto, o PL pode ter o efeito oposto.

👇
November 10, 2025 at 8:21 PM