OnlyPlans(Ch 11).bsky.social
banner
normaguariglia.bsky.social
OnlyPlans(Ch 11).bsky.social
@normaguariglia.bsky.social
Bankruptcy law enthusiast, adjunct professor, loves food, humor, and sarcasm.
No doubt that even the cantaloupe he’s fucking is a white one.
June 12, 2025 at 12:08 PM
I write more motions than I care to because ch 11 debtor work is motionpalooza.

I usually say, “in conclusion, [movant] respectfully requests blah blah, because it seems less legalese than “wherefore.”
May 8, 2025 at 10:56 PM
This validates my fear of driving behind or next to a car-carrying semi truck on the freeway. You know one of those cars is just gonna fall off one day because some dude forgot to properly tighten some thingamajig.
May 8, 2025 at 7:20 AM
A few days ago on X, a MAGA replied to Miller’s post telling him that he’s so badass and “many women” are swooning over him. Repulsive.
May 7, 2025 at 10:52 AM
I have not watched this show yet. Do you recommend?
May 7, 2025 at 8:01 AM
Totally understandable. What you’re seeking is more “normal” than what I want at this point in my life.

And from what I know about you, anybody would be lucky to have you care about them. I hope you find what you’re looking for, and you’re probably wise to swipe past the “I do good sex” bios.😆
May 6, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Terrible, I know, but why lie? Unless…am I going to end up with the serial killers and sociopaths?
May 6, 2025 at 9:06 AM
If I have the need for a dating site in the future, my profile will be undoubtably awful. “Seeking non-creepy guy with excellent grooming habits to fuck when I want and then leave me alone because I don’t have the time or energy to nurture romantic relationships. Been there, done that, the end.”🤷🏻‍♀️
May 6, 2025 at 8:42 AM
Finally, someone gets my humor.😂Bless you.
May 6, 2025 at 5:01 AM
So happy for you—badass pilot!
May 5, 2025 at 10:32 AM
Over on the hell-site, the MAGA cult are all in lockstep agreeing that it’s better for children to only have a few toys because too many toys can overwhelm them. Felon 47 could take a dump in their stew and they’d praise it for its alleged protein content.
May 5, 2025 at 9:21 AM
😂
April 24, 2025 at 9:05 PM
So strange. Something like, “Dear counsel, thank you for your lovely letter. I’m glad you’re enjoying our nice weather. After some consideration, I regret to deny the request in your letter. Better luck next time. Sincerely, The Judge.”

Why not just issue an order?😂
April 24, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Imo, filing any letters addressed to the court is weird unless you’re a pro se party and don’t know how to write motions or status reports. My district has no “letter practice.” Are letters to the court a common thing?
April 24, 2025 at 6:26 AM
In the ‘90s, the most delicious chicken chow mein in a Chinese restaurant located in an old movie theatre in a tiny rural town. So unexpected, but I’ve searched and never found such delicious chow mein ever again.💔
April 24, 2025 at 6:14 AM
El Salvador has for the most part been flying under the radar with its gulags. Everybody knows, but it’s El Salvador, so we shrug. With the U.S. now implicated, it becomes a much bigger story and maybe too much scrutiny for Bukele’s “cool dictator” persona.
April 24, 2025 at 1:33 AM
I had a pissing match with a DOJ trial lawyer last week who was too lazy to email a Word redline for one paragraph he wanted to change in a proposed order. I don’t think it’d be too hard to run them ragged.
April 22, 2025 at 9:07 PM
47 is killing it with his deportation skills.😂
April 22, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Praise be!
April 18, 2025 at 4:45 AM
I’m no expert on this issue, but I believe fed court criminal contempt can ultimately only be enforced by U.S. marshals. And rhe Executive branch controls them and can direct them not to comply. But, under FRCP 4, the court can appoint someone else to enforce civil contempt; ie, even a mall cop.🤔
April 17, 2025 at 2:33 AM
I’ve made lawyers get a court order compelling our client files in response to a subpoena. The requesting parties argued that the subpoena was enough to satisfy the “law or court order” exception under R 1.6. Nope. The entire client file is confidential—not just the privileged stuff. Get an order.
April 16, 2025 at 5:28 AM
This is why penguin tariffs are vital.
April 11, 2025 at 7:25 AM
Yup. The issue for SCOTUS was not whether the removals were lawful in the first place. But with SCOTUS agreeing that all were entitled to reasonable notice, the lower courts should quickly afford relief to parties who did not get reasonable notice.

And SCOTUS should’ve left the TRO intact.
April 8, 2025 at 1:21 AM
I’m here occasionally! Just need to make it more of a habit.😬
August 19, 2024 at 4:00 AM