@nopodarrel.bsky.social
. . .pay a 100% tax on the excess over $400,000--in my example, pay $9,600,000 tax on the privilege of paying $10 million to your pampered employee. That would raise badly needed revenue for the US Treasury, but also discourage the outsize salaries so prevalent these days.
March 23, 2025 at 7:13 PM
. . .pay a 100% tax on the excess over $400,000--in my example, pay $9,600,000 tax on the privilege of paying $10 million to your pampered employee. That would raise badly needed revenue for the US Treasury, but also discourage the outsize salaries so prevalent these days.
I propose that we assess a tax on any employer who pays an employee more than $400,000 a year. That's what the US President earns for what is arguably the job with the greatest responsibility in the world. So if you want to pay your corporate CEO $10 million, go ahead. But pay a 100% tax on. . .
March 23, 2025 at 7:10 PM
I propose that we assess a tax on any employer who pays an employee more than $400,000 a year. That's what the US President earns for what is arguably the job with the greatest responsibility in the world. So if you want to pay your corporate CEO $10 million, go ahead. But pay a 100% tax on. . .
The children of my friend Carole, 92 in February, put on a series of receptions for her over the past 4 days. Although she is in the late stages of dementia, she enjoyed the "celebration of life" that took place before her passing, rather than after. How can we keep from singing?!
January 21, 2025 at 1:05 AM
The children of my friend Carole, 92 in February, put on a series of receptions for her over the past 4 days. Although she is in the late stages of dementia, she enjoyed the "celebration of life" that took place before her passing, rather than after. How can we keep from singing?!