they're literally openly waging war on their own citizens (quote trump: [chicago] will learn why it's called the department of war") and you pack of collaborators have the audacity to talk about "bipartisanship"?!
September 10, 2025 at 4:52 PM
they're literally openly waging war on their own citizens (quote trump: [chicago] will learn why it's called the department of war") and you pack of collaborators have the audacity to talk about "bipartisanship"?!
no, you should be focused on stopping the nazi theocracy going on right now.
September 10, 2025 at 4:45 PM
no, you should be focused on stopping the nazi theocracy going on right now.
fyi moselland is a vague area, riesling is a vague category.
neither are brands/companies/... that could "sell their wine" a certain way.
imagine like "Bourbon" or "Brie".
neither are brands/companies/... that could "sell their wine" a certain way.
imagine like "Bourbon" or "Brie".
August 31, 2025 at 7:23 AM
fyi moselland is a vague area, riesling is a vague category.
neither are brands/companies/... that could "sell their wine" a certain way.
imagine like "Bourbon" or "Brie".
neither are brands/companies/... that could "sell their wine" a certain way.
imagine like "Bourbon" or "Brie".
by that logic you could just give in to mastercard&co, that makes no sense.
August 31, 2025 at 7:13 AM
by that logic you could just give in to mastercard&co, that makes no sense.
yeah no sorry, but a company helping a war crime isn't the solution here. what's next, frikkin IDF betterhelp?
August 31, 2025 at 7:12 AM
yeah no sorry, but a company helping a war crime isn't the solution here. what's next, frikkin IDF betterhelp?
i know but its soooo weird...
August 30, 2025 at 6:18 AM
i know but its soooo weird...
but Canada is just as north america as the us-of-a...
if anything I would've thought "American" is a bit vague, applying to half the world's land mass?
if anything I would've thought "American" is a bit vague, applying to half the world's land mass?
August 30, 2025 at 6:12 AM
but Canada is just as north america as the us-of-a...
if anything I would've thought "American" is a bit vague, applying to half the world's land mass?
if anything I would've thought "American" is a bit vague, applying to half the world's land mass?
that's merely because dumb neurotypicals mislabel "asking what the frick you're on about with your arbitrary rules you won't explain" as "rebellious", and tyranny as "authority".
August 28, 2025 at 6:29 AM
that's merely because dumb neurotypicals mislabel "asking what the frick you're on about with your arbitrary rules you won't explain" as "rebellious", and tyranny as "authority".
that's why they said "the other way", not "towards some other conservative who doesn't give a crap".
July 31, 2025 at 4:05 AM
that's why they said "the other way", not "towards some other conservative who doesn't give a crap".
ESPECIALLY given literally zero of this is enforcable in first world jurisdictions, and you can't tell me a company operating worldwide doesn't know a lawyer who's heard of the EU.
where they would have had a perfect case against Visa/MC, and are now criminally liable for what they've done instead.
where they would have had a perfect case against Visa/MC, and are now criminally liable for what they've done instead.
July 26, 2025 at 6:02 AM
ESPECIALLY given literally zero of this is enforcable in first world jurisdictions, and you can't tell me a company operating worldwide doesn't know a lawyer who's heard of the EU.
where they would have had a perfect case against Visa/MC, and are now criminally liable for what they've done instead.
where they would have had a perfect case against Visa/MC, and are now criminally liable for what they've done instead.
at least from assholes like Visa and Mastercard, one *expects* "Money > Morals", but you dont get to pull this stunt, "explain" it by completely agreeing with your own accusers dogwhistles in sentence 1, while claiming to be "inclusive" or anything other than greedy.
July 26, 2025 at 6:00 AM
at least from assholes like Visa and Mastercard, one *expects* "Money > Morals", but you dont get to pull this stunt, "explain" it by completely agreeing with your own accusers dogwhistles in sentence 1, while claiming to be "inclusive" or anything other than greedy.
(for anyone still struggling with basic common sense: "innocent until proven guilty" is not "sadly complying under protest, accidentally, for the community, blahblahblah". fixing a few of the shitshow later while being silent on it doesnt fix the attitude they've already proven.)
July 26, 2025 at 5:57 AM
(for anyone still struggling with basic common sense: "innocent until proven guilty" is not "sadly complying under protest, accidentally, for the community, blahblahblah". fixing a few of the shitshow later while being silent on it doesnt fix the attitude they've already proven.)
so you don't get what you're talking about, got it.
July 26, 2025 at 5:33 AM
so you don't get what you're talking about, got it.
then why did the post literally start with the words "we delisted nsfw games"?
you can stop grasping for straws.
you can stop grasping for straws.
July 25, 2025 at 10:21 PM
then why did the post literally start with the words "we delisted nsfw games"?
you can stop grasping for straws.
you can stop grasping for straws.