No-Ls (+18)
@no-ls.bsky.social
L | NSFW 🔞 | Art for the freaks and geeks | NO/NEVER AI
Reposted by No-Ls (+18)
Help us win this fight by chipping in at katforillinois.com/legal
Defend Kat Against Unjust Charges
Show your support with a contribution.
katforillinois.com
November 1, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Help us win this fight by chipping in at katforillinois.com/legal
Reposted by No-Ls (+18)
"The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered"
It's the first time I've seen it written into law.
It's the first time I've seen it written into law.
September 15, 2025 at 9:15 PM
"The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered"
It's the first time I've seen it written into law.
It's the first time I've seen it written into law.
Reposted by No-Ls (+18)
The "Anticorruption of Public Morals Act," intro'd by Rep. Schriver, is unlikely to go anywhere. But it does have 5 co-sponsors— a ludicrous bill is backed by 20% of Republicans in the MI House. That's not nothing.
Republicans are telling you what they would do if they could get away with it.
Republicans are telling you what they would do if they could get away with it.
September 15, 2025 at 8:55 PM
The "Anticorruption of Public Morals Act," intro'd by Rep. Schriver, is unlikely to go anywhere. But it does have 5 co-sponsors— a ludicrous bill is backed by 20% of Republicans in the MI House. That's not nothing.
Republicans are telling you what they would do if they could get away with it.
Republicans are telling you what they would do if they could get away with it.