njffc.bsky.social
@njffc.bsky.social
Now more than ever, in a time of so much uncertainty, I want to thank you for being part of this effort. Together, we can continue our work to ensure that every student in NJ has access to the high-quality public education they deserve, regardless of what’s happening in DC.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
As mentioned, Congress is the entity that appropriates federal education funding, so Trump can't do that without the support of Congress.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
We don’t yet know what this EO and any associated Department actions may mean for the federal education funding that NJ receives. But we do know that Trump’s stated goal is to return education fully to states, ending federal funding entirely.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
He also cannot remove or reduce funding that Congress has appropriated; however, he can starve USED of resources and can direct agency staff to begin restructuring, dismantling operations, and transferring functions to other departments like the Treasury or Justice.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
It’s important to know that the President lacks the authority to eliminate USED without congressional approval because the department was created through legislation.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
We must continue pushing for a fairer funding formula, holding our state leaders accountable, and organizing our communities to defend public education at every level.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
Without strong, coordinated advocacy, we risk widening inequities that already exist across NJ.

That’s where NJFFC comes in. Our collective voice is a critical force for equity.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
This EO threatens to strip away vital protections, resources, and oversight that support students. If the federal role in education is diminished, the responsibility will fall even more heavily on state and local systems.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
While the full implications will unfold over time, what’s clear right now is this: our work to ensure fair funding for NJ’s public schools and students has never been more urgent.
March 22, 2025 at 10:35 AM
🚫 The bad: This is only for the 2025-26 school year. For this to apply beyond that, either the next governor would need to continue it on an annual basis, or the Legislature would need to change the formula for SFRA.
March 6, 2025 at 12:48 PM
✅ The good: This allows for much greater accuracy in revenue allocation and ensures that students receive the funding they need for the services they require and are legally entitled to.
March 6, 2025 at 12:48 PM
3. Special education funding is based on district classification rates (rather than the previous census-based model that applied a State average number to all districts).
March 6, 2025 at 12:48 PM
🚫 The bad: Aggregate income is still used instead of avg income, though avg income can ensure that extreme wealth outliers don't skew the data. And the multipliers used & how they’re determined is not transparent at all - the multipliers have been different every year, making forecasting impossible.
March 6, 2025 at 12:48 PM
✅ The good: This increases stability for districts when there are significant changes from one year to another.
March 6, 2025 at 12:48 PM
2. Three year averages were used for the elements of the Local Fair Share calculations - equalized valuation (property values) and district income (aggregate income).
March 6, 2025 at 12:48 PM
🚫The bad: This doesn't take into account the stabilized funding districts who were cut last year received, so the cuts are larger for many districts. When that funding is taken into account, the average reduction for districts that received decreases both last year and this year was more than 9%.
March 6, 2025 at 12:48 PM
✅ The good: This reduced year-over-year volatility for school districts, especially those who have experienced large increases in prior years.
March 6, 2025 at 12:48 PM
Sources:
New Jersey Department of Education www.nj.gov/education/sp...
Education Law Center edlawcenter.org/wp-content/u... @edlawcenter.bsky.social
2023-2024 IDEA Public 618 Data
IDEA public data
www.nj.gov
February 15, 2025 at 11:11 AM
Prelim analysis shows a shift to fund SpEd by classification rates is nearly cost-neutral: In 22-23, districts with higher rates were underfunded by $378M & districts with lower rates were overfunded by $287M. Making this shift represents less than a 1% increase in NJ’s education budget.
February 15, 2025 at 11:11 AM
Traditional public schools, where classification rates average 17.63% and can climb as high as 33.41%, are routinely underfunded, while charter and vocational schools with lower classification rates – averaging 11.05% and 9.91%, respectively – are receiving more funding than they need.
February 15, 2025 at 11:11 AM