nitish v
banner
nitishv.bsky.social
nitish v
@nitishv.bsky.social
Columbia Law 27’
SAIS 24’, Stanford 21’, formerly CISAC

interested in law of armed conflict, appellate litigation

likes or retweets are merely for my own reference and do not indicate endorsement
Right if the initial strike is predicated on a war-sustaining object theory rather than a military object theory, I think the second strike is much harder to justify
November 28, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Am a TA some of my 1Ls have interviews a day or two before finals
November 25, 2025 at 2:59 PM
iirc the strikes on isis oil tankers driven by civilians were preceded by warning shots and the like so the drivers would have the time to escape
November 13, 2025 at 12:56 AM
storage.courtlistener.com
September 30, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Reposted by nitish v
and big props to @knightcolumbia.org and @ramyakrishnan.bsky.social and @georgewang.bsky.social and everyone else at KFIA who worked on this vitally important case
September 30, 2025 at 5:27 PM
ah fantastic the little eyes were the hardest part for me to get
August 8, 2025 at 12:01 AM
in fairness aside from the 1925 cert reforms his tenure as chief is best remembered for holmes and brandeis regularly overshadowing him
August 4, 2025 at 4:18 AM