So at least one of those articles is claiming pensioners earning €1626 per month would have 2% more than working adults, which is just plain wrong.
And I fear this game of telephone / this actual misinformation is going to be detrimental to pensions especially if populists use this.

Fair enough. Though in the Fortune article it’s clearly written that pensions in France are on average “€1626 per month” (that’s the gross amount of “pensions de droit direct” (the net amount is actually €1512) but the average net income in France is in fact €2730 (private sector) and €2530 (public)

Here is the TLDR News segment (time coded) where they mention this and have a graph that is taken from the FT article and that cites OECD as a source through LIS youtu.be/0vtHl1GaXUA?...

Looking for mentions of the report here I also found this post that claims something similar for Italy (I think)

Thank you for this. It's just that a political news youtube channel (TLDR News) shared graphs from a Financial Times (tinyurl.com/d9mtxjx9) article that I believe was basing itself off an article from Fortune (tinyurl.com/27d3rv3s) and all claim pensions are on average higher than working wages 🤦‍♀️

Because I have seen articles citing a study that cites your report and the articles claim that pensions are higher than income for working adults, which I'm almost sure is false, definitely for France from all the information I've been able to find.

Hi, I'm hoping you can help me. I'm Hello, looking for information about the "average disposable income by age group in percentage of average disposable income of total population" cited in the report. Is that average income including things like people on unemployment and/or benefits?

Ah alright thank you

Goncharov was the latest Ships of the Northern Fleet, which was the latest Backrooms, which was the latest SCP.

Still, I find it funny how xitter refugees were mocking tumblr users for goncharov and then this happens.