Resonates well with the findings of this paper: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...

This would indeed be huge! Been waiting nearly 20(!) years for the resolution of that cliffhanger.

I raise you with the fact that I had a job talk on the same day with someone else, and we even met and socialized in between our talks. (Neither of us accepted the offer, and we still talk to each other regularly)

Wow, great idea for a paper! Strong closing of 2024!

Thanks for making me aware this feed exists!

They should also set quality standards IMO (just looking for a reason to post this paper on eggs)

pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/...

We also identify product and category moderators that make these effects stronger or weaker. One favourite finding is that absence claims can still work, but only in categories where there’s fewer of them. So, low fat yoghurt is not special, but low sodium soup is.(3/3)

In a nutshell, we show that presence nutrition (e.g. high in fibre) increase SKU choice on average, but absence nutrition claims (e.g. low fat/sugar) decrease choice. Both claim types do impact quantity purchased however. (2/3)

Thanks @juliencloarec.com, this should help kickstart my algorithm!